- This topic has 1,152 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
Posts
-
black and red
oh just get white then. ????
You have a good shot, friend
I have a terrible shot, floaters all day long.
I need to get new shoes for running
at least get a cool color this time.
black and red
I do! He has a good shot, I saw it!
You have a good shot, friend
lol wut
I do! He has a good shot, I saw it!
Wifi has more tools in his toolkit. He can fight, I think he has a little more offensive skills
lol wut
I think Struble is a better player than WiFi, but WiFi has a bit more grit, size and a really hard shot.
And while WiFi can drop the gloves, I have never liked a D-man to be the tough guy on the team, especially if they get additional minutes or a 10, etc.. You can more easily manage with a forward out that long than one of your 6 D.
Then again, I expect Guhle/Dobson/Hutson/Matheson/Carrier to eat most of the minutes, regardless of who the 6th D-man happens to be, so it might not matter… even if I am not 100% sure Matheson is there all season (or, at all).
To me it’s all about what’s your chair in the NHL. Struble is physical but doesn’t really fight and like everybody makes mistakes. His role isn’t clear and doesn’t bring much a part from the occasional big check.
Wifi has more tools in his toolkit. He can fight, I think he has a little more offensive skills, his rookie year he would join the rush and his shot used to hit the net alot. But I feel like he lost that part of his game and focused on the fighting too much.
It’s a question of who makes less mistake in his zone at this point, if Wifi can clean his gaime in his zone and not make more than Struble than to me the spot is his.
But if he takes dumb penalties, creates turnovers and his a liability, the spot becomes Struble’s
I like Strubs. He’s a decent 3rd pairing guy.
For me, he’s the standard that Xhekaj must surpass in order to stay in Montreal.
I think Struble is a better player than WiFi, but WiFi has a bit more grit, size and a really hard shot.
And while WiFi can drop the gloves, I have never liked a D-man to be the tough guy on the team, especially if they get additional minutes or a 10, etc.. You can more easily manage with a forward out that long than one of your 6 D.
Then again, I expect Guhle/Dobson/Hutson/Matheson/Carrier to eat most of the minutes, regardless of who the 6th D-man happens to be, so it might not matter… even if I am not 100% sure Matheson is there all season (or, at all).
I like Strubs. He’s a decent 3rd pairing guy.
For me, he’s the standard that Xhekaj must surpass in order to stay in Montreal.
scabby, good morning.
