- This topic has 2,195 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks, 3 days ago by
.
-
Posts
-
and yes Pat is always right
noice…
????I’m pretty sure he’s going to waive his NMC if he doesn’t want to play there lol…
like Marner did?
like Marner did?
Toronto was poor asset management due to how the team was built and their stubbornness to stick with the core four, that situation could’ve been avoided had they delt with it earlier.
the way you’re putting it is that players shouldn’t take advantage of their NMC, which was provided to them by the GM when they signed their contract.
the way you’re putting it is that players shouldn’t take advantage of their NMC, which was provided to them by the GM when they signed their contract.
you’re right, GMs are at fault 100%.
I would never as a gm give a NMC. never. nothing good can come out of it.I would never as a gm give a NMC. never. nothing good can come of it.
yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that. it’s also a matter of mutual confidence, not all players that get a no-movement clause will try to backstab the organization later on lol.
yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that
not even. you’re fucked. let say a player with a NMC changes is mind and wants to be traded, we saw that often. GMS have no options, they trade the guy.
but that doesn’t work the other way around!! well, not really, we do see it sometimes.
if you never give NMC… it’s pretty simple. we’re happy, we keep you, we’re not happy we trade you. and the same thing for the player, he can ask for a trade whenever he wants. fair deal for both sides.yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that
not even. you’re fucked. let say a player with a NMC changes is mind and wants to be traded, we saw that often. GMS have no options, they trade the guy.
but that doesn’t work the other way around!!
if you never give NMC… it’s pretty simple. we’re happy, we keep you, we’re not happy we trade you. and the same thing for the player, he can ask for a trade whenever he wants. fair deal for both sides.it’s a leverage given to the player so that he gets to have control over where he plays, for a special talent it’s a pretty standard thing. most NMCs don’t end up in this fucked up situation you’re alluding to.
in Marner’s case they even had time during his contract to trade him before the NMC kicked in, and they decided to stay put, wtf.
it’s a leverage given to the player so that he gets to have control over where he plays
yes, it’s also a way to lower the cap. we’ll give you less money but we’ll throw in a NMC…
I still don’t like it and would do without.yes, it’s also a way to lower the cap. we’ll give less money but we’ll throw in a NMC…
I still don’t like it and would do without.a 10 or 15 team no-trade list is the way to go…
????a 10 or 15 team no-trade list is the way to go…
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess (if I had a gun to my head)
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess
pretty cool how Caufield’s contract is built, he has a 15-team NTC for 2028-29, a 10-team NTC for 29-30, and a 5-team NTC for 30-31.
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess (if I had a gun to my head)
pretty cool how Caufield’s contract is built, he has a 15-team NTC for 2028-29, a 10-team NTC for 29-30, and a 5-team NTC for 30-31.
Caufield for Kaprisov, there you go
Caufield for Kaprisov, there you go
ohh so now you’re interested in the “(franker)”…
????ohh so now you’re interested in the “(franker)”…
are you crazy? lol
pretty sure Caufield would like to play in Minn though
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.