- This topic has 1,326 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 11 months, 3 weeks ago by
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
Posts
-
Per Lebrun:
More on the 84-game reg season starting in 26-27 season (reduce pre-season to 4 games max per team), the idea would be to start the reg season in last week of September as a result of shorter pre-season.
The added games likely coming within the division.welcome Garfield! send your requests to Hugo, currently on vacations. yes a delete button, and private MP would be nice.
actually there is a specific Hockeystove feedback thread, for suggestions…
Agreed (and hopefully never again). You cannot plan for that…
But the current growth rate is catch up, I do not expect the cap to grow by $9-10M per year, exponentially.
And if the rumours are true, the NHL wants to add 2 more teams (Atlanta 3.0 for some reason is one of them, Houston likely the other). Will be interesting to see if they increase revenue significantly or if they are below the average revenue threshold that exists today, which might slightly impact the cap.
In the end, it’s the fans who end up footing the bill … with the current inflation rate in the US, the financial flexibility of those fans is diminishing quickly.
There’s so much you can charge before the stands start emptying up … also TV contracts might also get limited in growth as networks keep losing subscribers. JMOAs for 2 new teams … God no (especially not Atlanta!!!), there’s barely enough NHL caliber players to fill out the current teams rosters.
I’m not interested in losing prospects after we just went through a rebuild.Fredo stated emphatically:
I mean cap the flat lined because of Covid mainly, chances of it happening again are not likely
Agreed (and hopefully never again). You cannot plan for that…
But the current growth rate is catch up, I do not expect the cap to grow by $9-10M per year, exponentially.
And if the rumours are true, the NHL wants to add 2 more teams (Atlanta 3.0 for some reason is one of them, Houston likely the other). Will be interesting to see if they increase revenue significantly or if they are below the average revenue threshold that exists today, which might slightly impact the cap.
A Lasagna Eating Cat said:
Interesting point of view … yep, there’s give and take for organizations and players.
On 5 year terms, the AAVs would be higher, which likely would not be noticed in the next few years, until the cap starts flat-lining again.
Could also make July 1st a lot more interesting and fun again, allow terms to rebuild faster.
(Or watch a total nightmare of signings happen, just as fun, as long as it is the other team).
I mean cap the flat lined because of Covid mainly, chances of it happening again are not likely
A Lasagna Eating Cat said:
Interesting point of view … yep, there’s give and take for organizations and players.
On 5 year terms, the AAVs would be higher, which likely would not be noticed in the next few years, until the cap starts flat-lining again.
Could also make July 1st a lot more interesting and fun again, allow terms to rebuild faster.
(Or watch a total nightmare of signings happen, just as fun, as long as it is the other team).
I think there is risk more for the team on shorter contracts (except for July 1st stuff).
Players could potentially win on 5 years big time, less willing to take discounts for longer term knowing they can cash in again sooner.
Flip side, teams are not held hostage for dumb mistakes for 7 (or 8) year, especially in an injury case like Price.
Interesting point of view … yep, there’s give and take for organizations and players.
Playoff salary cap was a must, it was getting ridiculous in some cases.
Agreed 100% … the maximum contracts should be 5 years in my opinion.
Maybe it will get there eventually.
Always funny that the league has to do rules to protect the owners from the GMs they hire. If you don’t want contracts over 5 years just don’t offer them. Gas companies can stick together to keep prices high but 32 GMs can’t
Playoff salary cap was a must, it was getting ridiculous in some cases.
Agreed 100% … the maximum contracts should be 5 years in my opinion.
I think there is risk more for the team on shorter contracts (except for July 1st stuff).
Players could potentially win on 5 years big time, less willing to take discounts for longer term knowing they can cash in again sooner.
Flip side, teams are not held hostage for dumb mistakes for 7 (or 8) year, especially in an injury case like Price.
What’s shorter? 6 years?
What’s shorter? 6 years?
the max lengths will be 7 and 6 years as oppose to 7 and 8 years.
Thanks Gramps!
