Game Thread 34-82 at Montreal vs Canadiens

Home Forums Chicago Blackhawks Game Thread 34-82 at Montreal vs Canadiens

Viewing 10 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #55474
      CoachFrenchy
      Participant

      Puck Drop: 6:00 PM CT
      TV / Streaming: CHSN

      Chicago Blackhawks

      Tyler Bertuzzi — Frank Nazar — André Burakovsky
      Nick Lardis — Ryan Greene — Oliver Moore
      Teuvo Teräväinen — Jason Dickinson — Ilya Mikheyev
      Colton Dach — Ryan Donato

      Alex Vlasic — Louis Crevier
      Wyatt Kaiser — Artyom Levshunov
      Matt Grzelcyk — Connor Murphy
      Ethan Del Mastro

      Spencer Knight

      PP 1: Dach, Donato, Bertuzzi, Burakovsky, Grzelcyk

      PP 2: Greene, Teravainen, Nazar, Lardis, Levshunov

      Montreal Canadiens

      Cole Caufield – Nick Suzuki – Zack Bolduc
      Juraj Slafkovsky – Oliver Kapanen – Ivan Demidov
      Alexandre Texier – Jake Evans – Josh Anderson
      Owen Beck – Joe Veleno – Brendan Gallagher

      Jayden Struble – Noah Dobson
      Lane Hutson – Alexandre Carrier
      Arber Xhekaj – Adam Engstrom

      Jakub Dobes

    • #55506
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      Moore grabbed by the shoulder and no holding call? 10 out of 10 times they call that on a Blackhawks player.

    • #55509
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      Wish Teuvo would of respected Caufields forehand side behind the net more so than whatever he could do from his backhand from there.

    • #55518
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      Common Nazar you’ve got to shoot that puck

    • #55529
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      Common Nazar bad penalty

    • #55530
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      20 with another hold

    • #55539
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      The little things Kaiser has got to take that stick away in front of the net,

      Gotta get mean kid

    • #55542
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      I mean common can’t the NHL invest in bigger screens for these refs, hahaha

    • #55556
      BetweenTheDots
      Participant

      That’s to bad, but i guess one closer to a top 5 pick

    • #55558
      boilermaker
      Participant

      This team is tough to watch without Bedard.

    • #55567
      boilermaker
      Participant

      15 SOG tonight. Poor performance. Will the Hawks win a game before Bedard returns from injury?

      • #55580
        LAHawk
        Participant

        From complimenting the rookie line last game, the trio all looked like they belong back in Rockford tonight.

        So what is the trade return for a guy making $5 mil and the other making 4.2 mil, each with 3 goals apiece? Might as well keep them and give them slightly less than an overpay next year as even if Bedard gets $11 million, they will still be approximately $17 million under the cap floor.

      • #55584
        TheREALWiz
        Participant

        No, not at all, L A HAWK, (AND Frenchy.)

        Playing them here but not yet having that big possession physical guy, that glues his possessions to his stic and not six goot and under.

        Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a strong attack zone presence” that couldn’t never really emerged.
        It would be lovelier to already be benefitting from past draft picks,
        and I wish that there already were useful possibilities precolating in Rockford that they could draw in for games like this one tonight.

        You know another an off-puck defender type forward, and you could’ve added in that size out there playing a Dach-like in establishes. And you want that guy to have Frondell-like upside, but moreover, that you are showing the Montreal advance-takers don’t just see those same not even Nazar-like enough to be asked to occupy long clock and take those beat’ns, over & over, heck, if we had a few more this would be a perfect time to use them.

        It always bothers me when games finally see a team desperate to score, the more they are pushing leading to them to becoming receivers of over-physical
        “defense” that has no chance of seeing an arm go up.

        Habs realize the ‘hawks are fast, but at this juncture they didn’t have a big pushy then likes of who maybe one of their other selections, he bigger boys.

        Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a “strong attack zone presence” that emerges in the likes of Behn, Bosivert, West, Nestrasil, or Vanacher. A strong attack zone presence means big, quick-stick forwards, grabbing pucks and establish more physicality than our lines could adequately provide for us, given they are no giants who possess the match-up against them tonight. No wonder if Foligno felt it too, so wanting to play.

        Well, I, the poor sport doesn’t think Roman Kantserov is the answer to strong attack zone presence” either.

      • #55585
        TheREALWiz
        Participant

        No, not at all, L A HAWK, (AND Frenchy.)

        Playing them here but not yet having that big possession physical guy, that glues his possessions to his stick and not six goot and under.

        Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a strong attack zone presence” that couldn’t never really emerged.
        It would be lovelier to already be benefitting from past draft picks,
        and I wish that there already were useful possibilities precolating in Rockford that they could draw in for games like this one tonight.

        You know another an off-puck defender type forward, and you could’ve added in that size out there playing a Dach-like in establishes. And you want that guy to have Frondell-like upside, but moreover, that you are showing the Montreal advance-takers don’t just see those same not even Nazar-like enough to be asked to occupy long clock and take those beat’ns, over & over, heck, if we had a few more this would be a perfect time to use them.

        It always bothers me when games finally see a team desperate to score, the more they are pushing leading to them to becoming receivers of over-physical
        “defense” that has no chance of seeing an arm go up.

        Habs realize the ‘hawks are fast, but at this juncture they didn’t have a big pushy then likes of who maybe one of their other selections, he bigger boys.

        Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a “strong attack zone presence” that emerges in the likes of Behn, Bosivert, West, Nestrasil, or Vanacher. A strong attack zone presence means big, quick-stick forwards, grabbing pucks and establish more physicality than our lines could adequately provide for us, given they are no giants who possess the match-up against them tonight. No wonder if Foligno felt it too, so wanting to play.

        Well, I, the poor sport doesn’t think Roman Kantserov is the answer to “strong attack zone presence” either.

      • #55632
        CoachFrenchy
        Participant

        Great comment — and honestly, you’re touching on something that goes beyond just last night’s game. What you described about the Blackhawks is very similar to what we’re seeing with the Montreal Canadiens this season, and that’s why the comparison works so well.

        Yes, the Canadiens are missing several regulars, but when they face bigger, more mature teams like LA, Minnesota, or Washington, the same issues show up: lack of sustained offensive-zone presence, limited physicality, and inconsistency. That’s not just a systems problem — it’s an immaturity problem.

        The final score doesn’t fully reflect how much control Montreal had last night. Knight probably saved two or three goals, and there were multiple disallowed goals as well. Still, your main point stands: size, strength on the puck, and forecheck pressure matter, especially when games tighten up.

        What you’re describing — big forwards who can hold pucks, absorb contact, and establish a real offensive-zone presence — is exactly what both organizations are missing at times. And no, Roman Kantserov alone isn’t the answer to that issue.

        Without Bedard in the lineup, this is where veterans have to step up. Guys like Bertuzzi, Donato, and Mikheyev need to set the tone physically and emotionally. Young players can’t be the ones taking all the punishment every night.

        At the end of the day, the Blackhawks — like the Canadiens — need to get bigger, stronger, and harder to play against. Skill is there. The next step is maturity and edge. Time will tell, but management has to recognize it moving forward.

        Thanks again for the thoughtful comment — and FYI, I apologize if I missed replies lately, I’m no longer receiving email notifications.

Viewing 10 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Scroll to Top