Home › Forums › Chicago Blackhawks › Game Thread 34-82 at Montreal vs Canadiens
- This topic has 14 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
CoachFrenchy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 18, 2025 at 3:37 pm #55474
CoachFrenchy
ParticipantPuck Drop: 6:00 PM CT
TV / Streaming: CHSNChicago Blackhawks
Tyler Bertuzzi — Frank Nazar — André Burakovsky
Nick Lardis — Ryan Greene — Oliver Moore
Teuvo Teräväinen — Jason Dickinson — Ilya Mikheyev
Colton Dach — Ryan DonatoAlex Vlasic — Louis Crevier
Wyatt Kaiser — Artyom Levshunov
Matt Grzelcyk — Connor Murphy
Ethan Del MastroSpencer Knight
PP 1: Dach, Donato, Bertuzzi, Burakovsky, Grzelcyk
PP 2: Greene, Teravainen, Nazar, Lardis, Levshunov
Montreal Canadiens
Cole Caufield – Nick Suzuki – Zack Bolduc
Juraj Slafkovsky – Oliver Kapanen – Ivan Demidov
Alexandre Texier – Jake Evans – Josh Anderson
Owen Beck – Joe Veleno – Brendan GallagherJayden Struble – Noah Dobson
Lane Hutson – Alexandre Carrier
Arber Xhekaj – Adam EngstromJakub Dobes
-
December 18, 2025 at 7:41 pm #55506
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantMoore grabbed by the shoulder and no holding call? 10 out of 10 times they call that on a Blackhawks player.
-
December 18, 2025 at 7:45 pm #55509
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantWish Teuvo would of respected Caufields forehand side behind the net more so than whatever he could do from his backhand from there.
-
December 18, 2025 at 8:05 pm #55518
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantCommon Nazar you’ve got to shoot that puck
-
December 18, 2025 at 8:40 pm #55529
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantCommon Nazar bad penalty
-
December 18, 2025 at 8:40 pm #55530
BetweenTheDots
Participant20 with another hold
-
December 18, 2025 at 9:04 pm #55539
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantThe little things Kaiser has got to take that stick away in front of the net,
Gotta get mean kid
-
December 18, 2025 at 9:06 pm #55542
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantI mean common can’t the NHL invest in bigger screens for these refs, hahaha
-
December 18, 2025 at 9:28 pm #55556
BetweenTheDots
ParticipantThat’s to bad, but i guess one closer to a top 5 pick
-
December 18, 2025 at 9:34 pm #55558
boilermaker
ParticipantThis team is tough to watch without Bedard.
-
December 18, 2025 at 9:42 pm #55567
boilermaker
Participant15 SOG tonight. Poor performance. Will the Hawks win a game before Bedard returns from injury?
-
December 18, 2025 at 11:02 pm #55580
LAHawk
ParticipantFrom complimenting the rookie line last game, the trio all looked like they belong back in Rockford tonight.
So what is the trade return for a guy making $5 mil and the other making 4.2 mil, each with 3 goals apiece? Might as well keep them and give them slightly less than an overpay next year as even if Bedard gets $11 million, they will still be approximately $17 million under the cap floor.
-
December 18, 2025 at 11:14 pm #55584
TheREALWiz
ParticipantNo, not at all, L A HAWK, (AND Frenchy.)
Playing them here but not yet having that big possession physical guy, that glues his possessions to his stic and not six goot and under.
Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a strong attack zone presence” that couldn’t never really emerged.
It would be lovelier to already be benefitting from past draft picks,
and I wish that there already were useful possibilities precolating in Rockford that they could draw in for games like this one tonight.You know another an off-puck defender type forward, and you could’ve added in that size out there playing a Dach-like in establishes. And you want that guy to have Frondell-like upside, but moreover, that you are showing the Montreal advance-takers don’t just see those same not even Nazar-like enough to be asked to occupy long clock and take those beat’ns, over & over, heck, if we had a few more this would be a perfect time to use them.
It always bothers me when games finally see a team desperate to score, the more they are pushing leading to them to becoming receivers of over-physical
“defense” that has no chance of seeing an arm go up.Habs realize the ‘hawks are fast, but at this juncture they didn’t have a big pushy then likes of who maybe one of their other selections, he bigger boys.
Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a “strong attack zone presence” that emerges in the likes of Behn, Bosivert, West, Nestrasil, or Vanacher. A strong attack zone presence means big, quick-stick forwards, grabbing pucks and establish more physicality than our lines could adequately provide for us, given they are no giants who possess the match-up against them tonight. No wonder if Foligno felt it too, so wanting to play.
Well, I, the poor sport doesn’t think Roman Kantserov is the answer to strong attack zone presence” either.
-
December 18, 2025 at 11:17 pm #55585
TheREALWiz
ParticipantNo, not at all, L A HAWK, (AND Frenchy.)
Playing them here but not yet having that big possession physical guy, that glues his possessions to his stick and not six goot and under.
Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a strong attack zone presence” that couldn’t never really emerged.
It would be lovelier to already be benefitting from past draft picks,
and I wish that there already were useful possibilities precolating in Rockford that they could draw in for games like this one tonight.You know another an off-puck defender type forward, and you could’ve added in that size out there playing a Dach-like in establishes. And you want that guy to have Frondell-like upside, but moreover, that you are showing the Montreal advance-takers don’t just see those same not even Nazar-like enough to be asked to occupy long clock and take those beat’ns, over & over, heck, if we had a few more this would be a perfect time to use them.
It always bothers me when games finally see a team desperate to score, the more they are pushing leading to them to becoming receivers of over-physical
“defense” that has no chance of seeing an arm go up.Habs realize the ‘hawks are fast, but at this juncture they didn’t have a big pushy then likes of who maybe one of their other selections, he bigger boys.
Yeah, I like to think winning in Montreal tonight starts with a “strong attack zone presence” that emerges in the likes of Behn, Bosivert, West, Nestrasil, or Vanacher. A strong attack zone presence means big, quick-stick forwards, grabbing pucks and establish more physicality than our lines could adequately provide for us, given they are no giants who possess the match-up against them tonight. No wonder if Foligno felt it too, so wanting to play.
Well, I, the poor sport doesn’t think Roman Kantserov is the answer to “strong attack zone presence” either.
-
December 19, 2025 at 10:01 am #55632
CoachFrenchy
ParticipantGreat comment — and honestly, you’re touching on something that goes beyond just last night’s game. What you described about the Blackhawks is very similar to what we’re seeing with the Montreal Canadiens this season, and that’s why the comparison works so well.
Yes, the Canadiens are missing several regulars, but when they face bigger, more mature teams like LA, Minnesota, or Washington, the same issues show up: lack of sustained offensive-zone presence, limited physicality, and inconsistency. That’s not just a systems problem — it’s an immaturity problem.
The final score doesn’t fully reflect how much control Montreal had last night. Knight probably saved two or three goals, and there were multiple disallowed goals as well. Still, your main point stands: size, strength on the puck, and forecheck pressure matter, especially when games tighten up.
What you’re describing — big forwards who can hold pucks, absorb contact, and establish a real offensive-zone presence — is exactly what both organizations are missing at times. And no, Roman Kantserov alone isn’t the answer to that issue.
Without Bedard in the lineup, this is where veterans have to step up. Guys like Bertuzzi, Donato, and Mikheyev need to set the tone physically and emotionally. Young players can’t be the ones taking all the punishment every night.
At the end of the day, the Blackhawks — like the Canadiens — need to get bigger, stronger, and harder to play against. Skill is there. The next step is maturity and edge. Time will tell, but management has to recognize it moving forward.
Thanks again for the thoughtful comment — and FYI, I apologize if I missed replies lately, I’m no longer receiving email notifications.
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.