- This topic has 89 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 5 months ago by
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
Posts
-
So a GM is saying they want a top talent for a young prospect? Not letting the entire league know he wants that player gone at all costs and then become baffled when no one offers anything of value? Interesting concept.
Arent you suppose to just say please someone just take him??
So a GM is saying they want a top talent for a young prospect? Not letting the entire league know he wants that player gone at all costs and then become baffled when no one offers anything of value? Interesting concept.
Anyone interested in taking a flyer on Shane Wright? Id go for it! Cant see the Rangers developing him, they havent been able to develop anyone in a decade. What would the price be?
We discussed a 1 for 1, LAF for Wright deal, and it got a unanamous yes from everyone. Doesnt happen often.
I’ve been seeing that Seattle is looking to use Wright in a trade for a legitimate top 6f in their mid-late 20s like Robert Thomas or Jordan Kyrou from STL. They’re trying to take the next step. So that almost certainly rules out Laf. Whether Seattle can get that with Wright is another story
I would do that Kings deal.
I think the best case for Laf is to keep him and hope he figures it out. His value is too low for the risk/reward.
That trade/rumor was squashed. No one wants Laf. They need to permanently move him to LW and try that. His natural side and has yet to play there at all really. This probably ruined him more than anything. This was the problem having Kreider and Panarin for so long because he had play RW
