- This topic has 554 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
meh, the most significant absence is probably Guhle, other than that they have all their core players intact, shouldn’t be that bad lol.
yeah! have you seen the Rangers’ lineup? nothing to write home about tbh
yeah! have you seen the Rangers’ lineup? nothing to write home about tbh
yeah, the only thing keeping them in games right now is their goalie, if it wasn’t for him it would be a complete disaster.
yeah, the only thing keeping them in games right now is their goalie, if it wasn’t for him it would be a complete disaster.
they were so good just a few years ago. things change fast
Maybe I should have clarified, struggle in the context of dictating the play. Lineup shuffling can always have some interesting effects on the squad. Maybe it goes smoothly or maybe it doesn’t. Think it’s a scruffy and messy game tonight. Hopefully I’m wrong.
I couldn’t care less about Laine honestly, but the other two aren’t ideal. The loss of guhle stings the most by far.
Bolduc getting fucked with the new line-up, but good to finally see Anderson/Evans/Gallagher together.
Too bad about Guhle, but Metheson has played a lot better than expected, and top 4 should still be solid… looks like Struble moves up to play with Hutson.
Should be interesting to see what this patchwork lineup is able to do tonight. Going to be a struggle IMO.
meh, the most significant absence is probably Guhle, other than that they have all their core players intact, shouldn’t be that bad lol.
Bolduc se retrouve sur le 4e trio.
Ghule est un défenseur top 4 et notre 7e défenseur (struble) prend sa chaise ce soir (et pour les prochains matchs?).
Je pense que tu minimises un peu l’impact mon Pat.
Mais bon, les blessures font partie du jeu et le CH a une certaine profondeur.
Je n’aime pas le fait que Bolduc se retrouve sur la 4 avec Veleno et Beck. Selon moi il joue comme un top 6 depuis le début de la saison mais je comprends la situation.
On verra comment se débrouille Struble dans cette chaise, pas idéal là non plus.
did they change the rule for the penalty shot?
the dman dives and pokes the puck first, then clip the forward on a breakaway.
I was under the impression that wether he touches the puck or not, it’s a penalty.did they change the rule for the penalty shot?
the dman dives and pokes the puck first, then clip the forward on a breakaway.
I was under the impression that wether he touches the puck or not, it’s a penalty.I think you would be wrong if he touched the puck first but I dont have the rule book in front of me
I think you would be wrong if he touched the puck first but I dont have the rule book in front of me
I think that was the rule yes, but they changed it a few years ago.
Bolduc se retrouve sur le 4e trio.
Ghule est un défenseur top 4 et notre 7e défenseur (struble) prend sa chaise ce soir (et pour les prochains matchs?).
Je pense que tu minimises un peu l’impact mon Pat.
ouin, je disais simplement que le CH devrait être capable de s’en tirer sans difficultés majeures, j’ai jamais dit que ça aurait zéro impact non plus lol
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.