Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Blackhawks 2025-2026 General Comments #50654
    LAHawk
    Participant

    I don’t know what you were looking at, but it was a direct hit to the head with the top of his arm. You can see his head rock back. The problem with this, the NHL doesn’t care. Twice in two games and the NHL hasn’t taken any action. This is deplorable. They need stricter rules on hits to the head. Whether it was intentional or not, it is not acceptable. These are players’ lives. You would think the NHL would care a little about that.

    Ryan Lindgren was not suspended for his hit on Andre Burakovsky during their November 20, 2025 game because the hit was determined to be unavoidable head contact under NHL rules.
    The hit was reviewed by the NHL Department of Player Safety (DoPS), who found that while there was significant head contact, Lindgren was tracking the play with a proper angle of approach and did not extend his body upward or outward to target the head. The determination was that the primary point of contact was the body, and the head contact was a result of the dynamic nature of the play and Burakovsky’s body position

    So DOps did look at it, and this is the answer.

    in reply to: Blackhawks 2025-2026 General Comments #50523
    LAHawk
    Participant

    He has to get away from the 11/7 split. We played two periods with 10 forwards. They were gassed in the third period. If you have to worry about these defenseman so much, maybe they don’t belong in the NHL.

    Yep. The forwards were spent come the 3rd period. They had 5 forwards that skated over 20 minutes and they have a 6:00 puck drop 1,000 miles away the next day. ……. I absolutely loved how the 11-7 format has worked for THIS roster. It perfectly acclimated 3 green Dmen to the Bigs thru sheltered minutes. But, it might have run its course to an extent.

    We all know, and especially the organIzation knows, that every young player hits a wall in their first full season and running an 11-7 format for too long will exacerbate this. Think how the group didn’t (couldn’t) move their feet in the 3rd. Now imagine an over taxed young group will look in games 60-70-80?

    Looked at the lines and loved the fact that TT was bumped to L3 with Mikahev and Donato. With L1 and L2 able to score that L3 is not only dangerous, and will give then secondary scoring, but they can shut down as well. This is what we all clamored for. A fast dangerous top 6 with a legit difference making bottom 6. Depth! ….. Losing Burakovsky is gonna hurt but less so when you have Dickinson coming back bumping TT back up to the top 6.

    I know I am not the only one that watches games that do not involve the Hawks, Mackinnon, McDavid, Hughes (often injured) get hacked and whacked in prime scoring positions with no penalty called.

    Interesting about head hits too, I remember on the old board when Hagel ran Barkov with a direct head hit in the playoffs without the puck and Barkov was called soft.

    in reply to: Game Thread 20-82 at Chicago vs Kraken #50401
    LAHawk
    Participant

    With the Burakovsky injury, the 11/7 backfired tonight, like you said Rico the Hawks stopped moving their feet in the third. With Foligno and Burakovsky unavailable tommorrow, and Dickinson I assume iffy, my guess the Hawks call up Slaggert to take to Buffalo.

    in reply to: Game Thread 18-82 at Chicago vs Maple Leafs #49189
    LAHawk
    Participant

    It is the situation room that makes the call. Trend all year for all teams is if it is not obvious, they are not overturning the call.

    in reply to: Game Thread 18-82 at Chicago vs Maple Leafs #49157
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Toronto’s defense is pathetic

    in reply to: Game Thread 18-82 at Chicago vs Maple Leafs #49115
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Rinzel a healthy scratch.

    His ice time has been steadily declining, and is off PP1

    • This reply was modified 1 week ago by LAHawk.
    in reply to: Blackhawks 2025-2026 General Comments #48117
    LAHawk
    Participant

    If and a big if, they keep performing the way they are so do they trade Murphy? I can see Dickinson definitely being traded.

    Murphy has been a loyal warrior for years.
    He has a 10 team no-trade list according to capwages.
    My guess is they let him have a say in it, unless someone not on his NT list offers way too much. (unlikely imho)

    Dickinson, it all depends on his health.

    Overall I wonder how they approach the trade deadline if (just for example) the Hawks are out of the playoffs
    but have an outside chance to get in with a great end of year run.
    Would they keep the veterans in order to give the team more meaningful games for the youngsters?

    Like you said, a big “if” but also a lot of variables too.

    Mikhayev is an interesting case. UFA at the end of the year, at 32 y.o. He will be looking for his last big payday. Do you sign him (he probably will want a minimum of 3 years), trade him for an asset at the TDL, or wait until the end of the year and evaluate then?

    in reply to: Blackhawks 2025-2026 General Comments #48027
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Frenchy, what game log? Still do not see a game log logging in on my IPad this AM. Not the first time. Can’t comment on the game when you don’t know where to comment. This general blog is way behind most day’s also.

    Hawks goalies are keeping the game’s within reach until the offense start’s producing.

    Best move that happened over the off season was when the Denver coach declined the offer, and KD turned to Blashill. Last thing this team needed was another coach learning how to be an NHL coach.

    in reply to: Game Theeed 14-82 at Vancouver vs Canucks #47269
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Ref’s treating the game like it is an all-star game also.

    in reply to: Game Theeed 14-82 at Vancouver vs Canucks #47267
    LAHawk
    Participant

    About as much checking as an all-star game. Entertaining though.

    in reply to: Game Thread 10-82 at Chicago vs Ottawa #45776
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Best period I have seen from the Hawks in a long time.

    The 1st v LA was a nice period as well, LA……. When the structure beaks down there is no safety net for poor puck management. Same as periods 2-3 vs LA and in this 2nd v OTT. No structure and the mistakes become glaring.

    2nd and third against LA the Hawks played right into the Kings 1-3-1 scheme trying to carry it in rather than dump and chase. Played right into the Kings hands.

    in reply to: Game Thread 10-82 at Chicago vs Ottawa #45767
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Best period I have seen from the Hawks in a long time.

    in reply to: Game Thread 7-82 at Chicago vs Anaheim Ducks #43472
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Goalie win, how long has it been that the Hawks can say that.

    in reply to: Game Thread 4-82 at Chicago vs Mammoth #41998
    LAHawk
    Participant

    First western conference opponent and the game is a lot more skating and speed and less physical ( so far)

    in reply to: Game Thread 4-82 at Chicago vs Mammoth #41995
    LAHawk
    Participant

    Last year Donato buries that shot.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
Scroll to Top