Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
LAHawk
ParticipantMoore has been impressive at center. That line has been buzzing all night.
LAHawk
ParticipantMoore looks impressive at Center. That line has been buzzing all night.
LAHawk
ParticipantFirst 20 games, Knight was bailing the Hawks out when they made mistakes in the D zone, not so much lately.
LAHawk
ParticipantNice win out of the break. Soda fantastic. Maybe Bertuzzi goes on one of his goal scoring streaks
LAHawk
ParticipantHawks have 10 out of the next 13 at home in a condensed schedule before the Olympic Break. Hopefully the Hawks can right the ship before the break.
LAHawk
ParticipantIf the way we were winning was unsustainable in the beginning of the season then logic would say we need more talent, 3 ways of getting more talent is FA, trade or draft closer to 1st instead of 31st? At least they are guaranteed one avenue of getting better.
Saying tanking is the only way ignored reality. The Hawks didn’t win those Cups because they lost on purpose, they won because they drafted and developed players outside the top of the draft, and had competent management. Tons of teams tanked just as hard and are still irrelevant. Tanking gets you picks, it doesn’t build a dynasty. Development does.
If tanking worked like people claim, the Hawks wouldn’t be the exception_every bottom feeder would be a contender. High picks
Didn’t win those Cups, drafting, development, and smart trades did. Losing on purpose isn’t a strategy, it’s an excuse.If tanking were the only way, every rebuilding team would eventually contend. The NHL has shown over and over that development and scouting beat draft position
Tanking is what bad organizations hide behind. The Hawks built a dynasty because they were elite at development, not because they were elite at losing.
Bedard isn’t a rebuild, he is an opportunity. Tanking got Chicago a player, not a team. Until they show they can draft, develop, and build depth like the old Hawks did, “tanking works” is just a cope.
LAHawk
ParticipantHappy Holiday’s to all. Hoping the season doesn’t spiral out of control. In fact, unless KD gets a NHL ready forward back in trade, I would keep the forward UFA’s until the end of the year.
I think it would be detrimental to trade the above for mid round picks and get to rerun the Rem Pitlick’s, Joey Andrrson’s, Brett Seney’s to close out the year.
Also Del Maestro, Allen, Korchinski, and Commesso’s ELC’s are up this year. KD will have to decide how his defense and goaltending is going to look like next year. IMO when Grzelcyk goes, and if/when Murphy goes, he will still need to bring in a vet as a 6/7 role to close out the season.
I know there is a faction that thinks being one of the worst teams in the league again this year is fantastic because of draft position. IMO especially with the way the team started(knowing it was really unsustainable, as Knight was not going to keep a .934 save percentage for the entire season), a bottom 3 finish to me is a failure, as outside of kids getting some NHL time, it proves that they (collectively not necessarily individually) showed they didn’t improve over last year. I hope that doesn’t happen. Have no illusion of them being in the playoffs, but would love to see them out of the bottom 5.
From recent comments by the GM, he is already preparing to go back to tank mode. Not surprising, IMO that is his DNA.
LAHawk
ParticipantHawks need more offensive production from the D, yet you hear peep about Korchinski. I understand he is left handed, but they brought up del Maestro to sit as the 7th D.
Hawks had better success playing 11/7 than the traditional 12/6. Why not bring up Korchinski, have him on PP2, as it is Grzelcyk shelf life with the Hawks doesn’t last past the trade deadline anyway.
LAHawk
ParticipantIf a player had Chicago on a no trade list and was ok with Columbus, we don’t need that guy.
Point taken.
That’s why I wondered if maybe the CBJ shot him a contract number he liked to go there.
That would make the most sense imo. Maybe we’ll find out.I don’t think KD has/had any interest in acquiring Marchment, thus it is moot whether Marchment had Chicago on his no trade list or not.
LAHawk
ParticipantFrom complimenting the rookie line last game, the trio all looked like they belong back in Rockford tonight.
So what is the trade return for a guy making $5 mil and the other making 4.2 mil, each with 3 goals apiece? Might as well keep them and give them slightly less than an overpay next year as even if Bedard gets $11 million, they will still be approximately $17 million under the cap floor.
-
AuthorPosts