Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 649 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67637
    xizord
    Participant

    this place is deader than Pete’s crotch !!!

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67510
    xizord
    Participant

    lui as-tu demandé un autographe? lol

    et oui, si c’est le dernier match de Monty à MTL, c’est pas la fin du monde, et je lui souhaite d’avoir du succès ailleurs.

    non !! il était le 1er banc en entrant dans un petit CRJ, j’ai fourré les brakes à la hauteur du 2e banc, mais il était trop tard.

    Je me tourne vers mon boss : C’était Ti-Paul !!!

    Lui un estie de Francais : euh ?

    bah laisse faire !!

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67508
    xizord
    Participant

    did Montembum played his last game as a Habs ?

    with how Fowler played last night and with how he will most likely continue to perform, it’s very likely…

    Pete is gonna be so sad !!

    in the end the way to look at it is : we got him for free, a la Paul Byron ( je suis tombé face a face avec lui le mois passé en entrant dans l’Avion, he so small, its incredible)

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67500
    xizord
    Participant

    Dont remember ever seen the ranking in the east being that crazy

    its batshit crazy that Colombus is out of the playoff, but with 76 pts they would be first in the pacific

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67499
    xizord
    Participant

    did Montembum played his last game as a Habs ?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67498
    xizord
    Participant

    but stats-wise, Dobes is definitely better than Monty.

    nope, they have the same stats. except for wins, and that’s because the team score more goals when Dobes plays (4 goals vs 3 for Monty)

    there a big difference between 872 and 892 pops

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67387
    xizord
    Participant

    Pete! Fowlwer called up. feels like ’86 again 🙂

    thats an odd recall….worst case if you dont want to put Montembault, put Dobes again ?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67386
    xizord
    Participant

    looks like Laine could play tomorrow

    I think it would be Texier before tite-laine ?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67304
    xizord
    Participant

    “don’t think so, changes are pretty rare following a win.”

    True

    its also pretty funny Laine as been Healthy for a month and they kinda jsut dont talk about it

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #67289
    xizord
    Participant

    Any line up change for tonight ?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #66816
    xizord
    Participant

    I wouldn’t have minded a Corey Perry again, but he’s going back to (frank)ing Tampa Bay, ugh.[/quote]

    so TB looses in the final then !

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #66786
    xizord
    Participant

    I would have liked a Schenn ( for a small price) or a Stanley for the playoffs

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #66669
    xizord
    Participant

    even Michael McCarron was traded for a 2nd, seems like the trading prices are very high

    but Jeff petry only a 7th, WTF he was Pete’s favorite !!

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #66641
    xizord
    Participant

    A 1st and 5th for Roy is retarded

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #66637
    xizord
    Participant

    ya, thats not happening :

    NHL insider Marco D’Amico reported a bunch of new details on Montreal going after Thomas in a new article on Monday.

    “Sources indicate that the Canadiens are one of a handful of teams that are interested in acquiring Thomas from the Blues,” D’Amico writes. “And it wouldn’t come cheap, according to what RG is hearing.”

    MORE: Maple Leafs getting help from Flyers to trade veteran center

    The Blues want Michael Hage, according to D’Amico.

    Hage was the No. 21 overall pick in the 2024 NHL Draft and is still just 19 years old, a talented right-shot forward.

    The Blues apparently also like Kaiden Guhle.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 649 total)
Scroll to Top