Brossoit on Veleno

[kicksave856]

mr.peanut wrote:

I try

[Mash]

2 year deal for Struble, cap hit of $1.41M

I need to be a 6th/7th defenseman in the NHL….

[kicksave856]

Mash wrote:

2 year deal for Struble, cap hit of $1.41M

I need to be a 6th/7th defenseman in the NHL….

mash, why are mondays a thing?

[Mash]

I dunno, but on Mondays I am grumpy getting out of bed and I always want lasagna…

I think I was indoctrinated in my childhood to feel this way.

Not sure how…

EDIT: Also, so that Tuesdays does not feel so bad about itself.

• This reply was modified 2 months, 1 week ago by Mash.

[kicksave856]

Mash wrote:

I dunno, but on Mondays I am grumpy getting out of bed and I always want lasagna…

I think I was indoctrinated in my childhood to feel this way.

Not sure how…

EDIT: Also, so that Tuesdays does not feel so bad about itself.

wait, that’s garfield. you’re mash!

[Scabeh]

Mash wrote:

2 year deal for Struble, cap hit of $1.41M

I need to be a 6th/7th defenseman in the NHL….

I like Strubs. He’s a decent 3rd pairing guy.

For me, he’s the standard that Xhekaj must surpass in order to stay in Montreal.

[kicksave856]

Scabeh wrote:

I like Strubs. He’s a decent 3rd pairing guy.

For me, he’s the standard that Xhekaj must surpass in order to stay in Montreal.

scabby, good morning.

[Mash]

Scabeh wrote:

I like Strubs. He’s a decent 3rd pairing guy.

For me, he’s the standard that Xhekaj must surpass in order to stay in Montreal.

I think Struble is a better player than WiFi, but WiFi has a bit more grit, size and a really hard shot.

And while WiFi can drop the gloves, I have never liked a D-man to be the tough guy on the team, especially if they get additional minutes or a 10, etc.. You can more easily manage with a forward out that long than one of your 6 D.

Then again, I expect Guhle/Dobson/Hutson/Matheson/Carrier to eat most of the minutes, regardless of who the 6th D-man happens to be, so it might not matter… even if I am not 100% sure Matheson is there all season (or, at all).

[Fredo]

Mash wrote:

I think Struble is a better player than WiFi, but WiFi has a bit more grit, size and a really hard shot.

And while WiFi can drop the gloves, I have never liked a D-man to be the tough guy on the team, especially if they get additional minutes or a 10, etc.. You can more easily manage with a forward out that long than one of your 6 D.

Then again, I expect Guhle/Dobson/Hutson/Matheson/Carrier to eat most of the minutes, regardless of who the 6th D-man happens to be, so it might not matter… even if I am not 100% sure Matheson is there all season (or, at all).

To me it’s all about what’s your chair in the NHL. Struble is physical but doesn’t really fight and like everybody makes mistakes. His role isn’t clear and doesn’t bring much a part from the occasional big check.

Wifi has more tools in his toolkit. He can fight, I think he has a little more offensive skills, his rookie year he would join the rush and his shot used to hit the net alot. But I feel like he lost that part of his game and focused on the fighting too much.

It’s a question of who makes less mistake in his zone at this point, if Wifi can clean his gaime in his zone and not make more than Struble than to me the spot is his.

But if he takes dumb penalties, creates turnovers and his a liability, the spot becomes Struble’s

[mr.peanut]

Fredo wrote:

Wifi has more tools in his toolkit. He can fight, I think he has a little more offensive skills

lol wut

[Fredo]

mr.peanut wrote:

lol wut

I do! He has a good shot, I saw it!

[mr.peanut]

Fredo wrote:

I do! He has a good shot, I saw it!

You have a good shot, friend

[IceColdPepsi]

kicksave856 wrote:

mr.peanut wrote:

I need to get new shoes for running

at least get a cool color this time.

black and red

[IceColdPepsi]

Love a good strudel

[Fredo]

mr.peanut wrote:

You have a good shot, friend

I have a terrible shot, floaters all day long.

[Author]

Posts