- This topic has 2,195 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 10 months ago by
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
Posts
-
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess
pretty cool how Caufield’s contract is built, he has a 15-team NTC for 2028-29, a 10-team NTC for 29-30, and a 5-team NTC for 30-31.
a 10 or 15 team no-trade list is the way to go…
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess (if I had a gun to my head)
yes, it’s also a way to lower the cap. we’ll give less money but we’ll throw in a NMC…
I still don’t like it and would do without.a 10 or 15 team no-trade list is the way to go…
????it’s a leverage given to the player so that he gets to have control over where he plays
yes, it’s also a way to lower the cap. we’ll give you less money but we’ll throw in a NMC…
I still don’t like it and would do without.yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that
not even. you’re fucked. let say a player with a NMC changes is mind and wants to be traded, we saw that often. GMS have no options, they trade the guy.
but that doesn’t work the other way around!!
if you never give NMC… it’s pretty simple. we’re happy, we keep you, we’re not happy we trade you. and the same thing for the player, he can ask for a trade whenever he wants. fair deal for both sides.it’s a leverage given to the player so that he gets to have control over where he plays, for a special talent it’s a pretty standard thing. most NMCs don’t end up in this fucked up situation you’re alluding to.
in Marner’s case they even had time during his contract to trade him before the NMC kicked in, and they decided to stay put, wtf.
yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that
not even. you’re fucked. let say a player with a NMC changes is mind and wants to be traded, we saw that often. GMS have no options, they trade the guy.
but that doesn’t work the other way around!! well, not really, we do see it sometimes.
if you never give NMC… it’s pretty simple. we’re happy, we keep you, we’re not happy we trade you. and the same thing for the player, he can ask for a trade whenever he wants. fair deal for both sides.I would never as a gm give a NMC. never. nothing good can come of it.
yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that. it’s also a matter of mutual confidence, not all players that get a no-movement clause will try to backstab the organization later on lol.
the way you’re putting it is that players shouldn’t take advantage of their NMC, which was provided to them by the GM when they signed their contract.
you’re right, GMs are at fault 100%.
I would never as a gm give a NMC. never. nothing good can come out of it.like Marner did?
Toronto was poor asset management due to how the team was built and their stubbornness to stick with the core four, that situation could’ve been avoided had they delt with it earlier.
the way you’re putting it is that players shouldn’t take advantage of their NMC, which was provided to them by the GM when they signed their contract.
I’m pretty sure he’s going to waive his NMC if he doesn’t want to play there lol…
like Marner did?
