Leafs Draft and Free Agency 2026

Home Forums Toronto Maple Leafs Leafs Draft and Free Agency 2026

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 639 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
  • Author
    Posts
  • #77456
    Dozzer
    Participant

    Since he loves them so much The Leafs could hire UG and UG would criticize The Leafs for doing so.

    #77450
    dmnted
    Participant

    just because the a coach doesn’t have NHL experience doesn’t mean he’s not qualified to coach in the NHL.

    #77446
    ribs1909
    Participant

    Or maybe possibly he wanted some head coaching experience? I mean probably not because there are no other options than the ones that come from a shit stain like you right? All that inside information you have to substantiate your claims. Fuck I cannot imagine the NASA sized computer brain you must have to know everything.

    Unpossible, experience is worthless to the Leafs. They just hire and promote unqualified guys all the time.

    If coaching experience meant anything to the Leafs they’d have kept Lalonde (and his two Cups) and his PK that actually was the only aspect of the Leafs that didn’t suck ass last year instead of hiring a guy with zero pro experience because he’s an analytics asshole.

    I can’t imagine you being more retarded with each passing day but as Einstein said, stupidity is limitless.

    I was talking about Steve Sullivan wanting the head coaching experience but whatever move the goalposts whatever way you want. We get it. We are all retards and you know absolutely everything.

    #77417
    Unholy_Goalie
    Participant

    Or maybe possibly he wanted some head coaching experience? I mean probably not because there are no other options than the ones that come from a shit stain like you right? All that inside information you have to substantiate your claims. Fuck I cannot imagine the NASA sized computer brain you must have to know everything.

    Unpossible, experience is worthless to the Leafs. They just hire and promote unqualified guys all the time.

    If coaching experience meant anything to the Leafs they’d have kept Lalonde (and his two Cups) and his PK that actually was the only aspect of the Leafs that didn’t suck ass last year instead of hiring a guy with zero pro experience because he’s an analytics asshole.

    I can’t imagine you being more retarded with each passing day but as Einstein said, stupidity is limitless.

    #77416
    ribs1909
    Participant

    Unpossible, all I read here last year was how shit he is.

    Only a retard like you could look at a demotion as a win. Got replaced by a Senaturd no less too.

    Or maybe possibly he wanted some head coaching experience? I mean probably not because there are no other options than the ones that come from a shit stain like you right? All that inside information you have to substantiate your claims. Fuck I cannot imagine the NASA sized computer brain you must have to know everything.

    #77414
    Unholy_Goalie
    Participant

    Unpossible, all I read here last year was how shit he is.

    Only a retard like you could look at a demotion as a win. Got replaced by a Senaturd no less too.

    #77413
    PrinceLH
    Participant

    In reality, Rielly was the one that needed (and still needs) to go and the Leafs still can’t make it happen, meanwhile Nurse went to the Sharks with 0 dollars retained by the Oilers and they got a top prospect to boot. The Leafs are retarded. Those are the facts. End of story.

    This is the prophecy that makes you incorrect. You keep saying that we should have ditched Rielly and a bunch of 3rd and 4th liners for Cap. The issue really was about the Salary Cap and no Movement clauses. We’re realizing that Rielly was unmovable back then and now. He had a no movement clause, that he’s still wielding today. He supposedly has a 4 team list of places that he would go, but do any of those 4 teams want him on their roster? $7.5M of Cap space is just off limits until they can move him. In reality, he could just keep saying no and he’s still part of the team and the Cap space and roster spot is unusable. On the 3rd and 4th liners that you mentioned, you do have to fill out the roster and that takes Cap space. Right now Chayka has done a good job at gutting the bottom 6 and replacing most of them, but still….it takes Cap Space. It’s why the imbecile Treliving had to let Marner go, because his dinosaur brain could not compute and he didn’t have a lot of options. I’m glad that they sent him off to the land of Dinosaur bones before he could completely destroyed the roster and traded Knies. That trade chip may become more relevant going forward, with the lower cap hit of a top 6, younger player with the ability to trade him anywhere.

    Looking at some of the teams that have a massive number of top draft picks, like San Jose and Anaheim, they won’t be able to fit too many of their under 25 young stars under the new Cap, when they’re looking for $20M per season. Knies could easily fit at $7M, so getting a top end talent, that would cost more on the Cap, for a player that’s maybe a step below at $7M even up could work. It’s a good poker chip to have moving forward. The NHL is screwed with the new dynamics after the entry level contracts expire. San Jose are going to find out fast, within 3 years.

    #77408
    ribs1909
    Participant

    Sullivan is going to be the the Marlies new head coach.

    Unpossible, all I read here last year was how shit he is.

    #77406
    dmnted
    Participant

    Sullivan is going to be the the Marlies new head coach.

    #77389
    Unholy_Goalie
    Participant

    Love Marner or hate him, there is one constant that needs to be addressed. His salary Cap hit. The Leafs were having Cap problems before he left. Something similar is about to fall on the heads of the Anaheim Ducks.

    Incorrect. The Leafs could have easily fit Marner last year but they decided to waste money on pylons like Maccelli, Joshua, Roy, Laughton, Jarnkrok, Carlo and Rielly. The Leafs “cap space” problem is self-inflicted. When the “cap crunch” happens, it should cost you your worst players, not your best. Look at Florida and Vegas. Somehow, they find a way to cut the fat without losing their best pieces. It’s called good management which is something the Leafs haven’t had in 59 years.

    Too many players, with no playoff pedigree looking for top dollar. Young, talented, but unproven. The Leafs went through 10 years of this core and they couldn’t reach the 3rd round. Something had to give. Marner was the last one up, after Matthews and Nylander signed.

    Again, incorrect. The problem was Tavares. He made way too much money and was the worst playoff performer of all the Leafs core players. Instead of telling him to take a hike, they re-signed him because he was cheap. Years of failure fall on more players than just Marner. Nylander could have been traded and never was. Rielly? Still here. The reality is, the Leafs needed a scapegoat to take the blame off their own bad management so they blamed Marner. The sheep, much like libtards, took the bait hook, line and sinker. Why hold the actual problem people (liberals) accountable when you can blame the scapegoat (America) instead?

    Would it have made a difference if Marner was a Center? Probably. Wingers shouldn’t be considered the most important position on the team. Hence, they should be paid less than a Center. Unfortunately for Marner, he wanted Matthews money and it wasn’t going to happen.

    Strike three, wrong again. Marner played center for Vegas when the team was hit with injuries. The only reason Marner wasn’t developed as a center is because the Leafs were too stupid to develop him as one. Hunter literally said after they drafted him he viewed him as a center. The Leafs, being the retards that they are, did not. Again, that’s not on Marner, that’s on the Leafs. Did Matthews lead the playoffs in scoring and go to the Cup Final last year? Oh, he didn’t? But he gets “Matthews” money, right? Right. Marner was worth it and the Leafs were too retarded to see it.

    The Leafs couldn’t find a way to pay three, in their prime forwards max money. So he had to go.

    Wrong again. The Leafs could have afforded to keep Matthews, Marner and Nylander but even in a world where they couldn’t, Nylander should have been traded if they absolutely had to pick only two of the three. He would have got a lot more in return than Nic Roy, that’s for damn sure. If the theory is true that losing Marner wasn’t the reason the Leafs finished last in the division, they would have still drafted McKenna and had they paid Marner “Matthews money” and traded Nylander, it would have yielded a better final outcome. McKenna | Matthews | Marner + whatever you got in return for Nylander (top-six forward + top-four D) is what the Leafs should be looking at right now. Instead, they’ll be lucky if they’re a wild card team.

    In reality, Rielly was the one that needed (and still needs) to go and the Leafs still can’t make it happen, meanwhile Nurse went to the Sharks with 0 dollars retained by the Oilers and they got a top prospect to boot. The Leafs are retarded. Those are the facts. End of story.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 639 total)
Scroll to Top