[monsieurchicken]

Pete will never know about this game.

[monsieurchicken]

kicksave856 wrote:

canada, good barely still morning.

sleep late! it’s good for you!

sure, why not

[monsieurchicken]

kicksave856 wrote:

mr.peanut wrote:

Happy new year everyone!!!

good 2026, canada.

Fuuuck yeah, happy new year kick.

Please dont work today

[monsieurchicken]

you’re the man.

you are.[/quote]I’m a Monsieur!

[monsieurchicken]

Monty was great.

Also, Suzuki is the man.

[monsieurchicken]

pete26 wrote:

Another Christmas miracle..

I came!

Snow all over!

[monsieurchicken]

je pense que Kapanen est sans doute meilleur et a plus de potentiel que ce que laisse entendre le Snake, mais à long terme je pense pas qu’il va demeurer dans le top 6…

ceci étant dit, comme dans le cas de Slaf et Bolduc, Kapanen est encore jeune, et il a pas cessé de me surprendre cette année, alors on sait jamais lol.[/quote]

Selon moi c’est top tôt pour dire à coup sûr qui va jouer où, Zharovsky a du potentiel lui aussi. Et pourrait jouer au centre.

Plus on a de profondeur, mieux c’est. Je crois encore au potentiel de Bolduc qui n’a pas encore deux ans dans la LNH.

Je pense que la venue de Dobson puis la signature de Matheson nous aide énormément au niveau de la ligne bleue pour les prochaines années. On pourrait avoir de la marge pour échanger un jeune défenseur éventuellement, selon le retour. Mais on a encore des jeunes attaquants qui s’en viennent et qui vont contiuer de se développer avec le grand club. C’est la saison recrue de Demidov, il va devenir meilleur rapidement.

Ma grosse déception à date (en dehors des blessés) demeure Montembault. Je pense encore qu’il peut se replacer, le problême semble plus mental, à moins qu’il s’agisse d’une blessure qui ne guérie pas?

[monsieurchicken]

Pat1993 wrote:

monsieurchicken wrote:

Hage

technically he’d be taking Kapanen’s place, not Slaf’s.

Pas forcément. Si Kapanen fonctionne bien au centre, pas de raison de le déplacer. Hage ne va pas forcément jouer au centre dans la LNH, pas si on écoute le Snake.

Aussi et même si je comprends ce que tu veux dire, Si slaf fait bien sur le deuxième trio avec Demidov, Hage ne prendait pas la place de slaf mais viendrait combler le vide sur le premier trio.

• This reply was modified 4 months, 4 weeks ago by monsieurchicken.

[monsieurchicken]

Mash wrote:

Pat1993 wrote:

Texier on the 1st line, good for him but I don’t know why he’s there to be honest lol.

Slaf makes the offence work.

Just need another Slaf.

Hage

[monsieurchicken]

@ Scabeh: agreed, way too soon to say he is not a first line (or top 6) player. Slaf is only started to get there after 3 seasons i the nhl and he was a 1st overall pick. Its only Bolduc 2nd season in the NHL. I think fans forget how green and how young he is.

[monsieurchicken]

Scabeh wrote:

Pat1993 wrote:

Monty in tonight, against his former team, hopefully he’s found his mojo back…

Texier on the 1st line, good for him but I don’t know why he’s there to be honest lol.

A good performance from Monty would go a long way to both helping the team and letting Fowler develop properly in Laval. Sadly, he hasn’t shown anything this season that could inspire confidence in that regard.

As for Texier, he’s kinda there by default. Bolduc doesn’t seem to click all that well with Suzuki and Caufield. In fact, I’m thinking there’s a good chance Dach ends up on their wing when he comes back if the Demidov-Kapanen-Slafkovsky line keeps producing the way they have.

I would have given the same anwser. Easy take to have.

When is Dach is coming back? And why do you think Bolduc is not a good fit there with Suzuki and Caufield?

[monsieurchicken]

man, that’s great. i’m so happy for you. you deserve it![/quote]

Ive spent the whole week last week in front of my boss house to tell her to fuck off!

this week? The whole week in front of her house to tell her Im sorry about last week.

I need to keep this job!

[monsieurchicken]

kicksave856 wrote:

canada, it’s monday now. that part is bad.

but it’s a short week! so that part is okay.

I don’t even work untill next Monday.

[monsieurchicken]

Mash wrote:

Pat1993 wrote:

5 games in a row with at least a point, not too bad considering the standings.

The only problem with that is that every team in the east has gotten over 50% of their possible points this year… the 1 point is nice, but they need to be getting 2 (especially with a lot less tiebreakers than some other teams).

I think there are like 4 or 5 teams in the league that have not gotten 50% of their potential points, just seems insane to me.

There is not one team in the East that is a lock to make the playoffs. Not. One.

Mtl is in a good position overall right out and thats all you can ask for. Should be a race to make it right untill the end.

[monsieurchicken]

Pat1993 wrote:

ugh, a shootout loss, too bad, that was a great comeback..!

Ils perdaient 4-1 en 3e période et ont égalisé avec 3 secondes à faire. Ils ont volé un point pas mal plus qu’ils en ont perdu 1.

Gros match de Slaf. Il joue bien avec Demidov.

D’accord avec Fido, grosse mise au jeu de Danault à la fin de la 3e période. C’est pour ça qu’il est là.

[Author]

Posts