Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 698 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #60297
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Beck and Fowler to Laval. excellent!

    I don’t know if it’s “excellent”, but I’m fine with the decision.

    On a deja eu cette conversation la quand on avait Primeau, Allen et Monty, 3 gardiens dans la LNH, ça ne fonctionne pas.

    Monty semble s’être replacé, c’est le gardien numéro 1 du CH présentement. Fowler le sera un jour, juste pas en 2026. Il aura beaucoup plus de départs à Laval qu’à Montréal.

    Dobes qui joue un match de temps à autre comme réserviste, c’est ok. À priori. Il donne beaucoup de buts en ce moment, mais justement, le ménage à 3 n’était pas à son avantage.Même chose que Fowler qui a lui aussi ralenti dernièrement.

    J’ai confiance en Monty pour comme numéro 1 pour le reste de la saison et les séries,on verra si Dobes se replace comme réserviste avec un peu plus de départs et avec ce vote de confiance.Au pire c’est plus facile faire un échange pour un back up que pour un gardien numéro un. Si on en arrive là.

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #60043
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    up to you Pat.
    Jacob to the tub or Fowler to the shower

    dobes to Laval, but fowler could follower him

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #60032
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    the war in ukraine didn’t take as long as today is taking.

    wait,what?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59189
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Transitional is my guess. Rhodes v Rhodes (no title) will probably be the angle. You like the swap?[/quote]

    Rhodes vs Rhodes? Cody vs his bother?

    I like Cody but the story was way better with him chasing the title and Reign with that crazy run as a heel. I like Drew so I dont mind but I expected him to lose after he burned that picture.

    I only watch some promos here and there and part of the matches. Its way too long to watch more than that, for me that is.

    Fatu and Bron are getting there as main eventers. Gunther is the top heel right now I would say. May win the Rumble or a title soon enough.

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59178
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Have a BAFC[/quote]

    Not at this time

    Also, never!

    What’s your take on drew winning the title?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59157
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Watching our leafs, you?[/quote] watching our Habs + stupid laundry

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59155
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Subban?[/quote]

    yes

    Sup, bro?

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59135
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    The pk played half the period

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #59118
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    so tomorrow, DET-MTL, the 2 top teams in the Atlantic. who would have tought?

    Rebuilds payoff

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #58229
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    @ kick : you cant say good morning in the afternoon! Thats why nobody said hello!

    Also : hello! Good morning! lol

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #58041
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    right now Demidov and Kapanen are respectively 1st and 5th in point totals for rookies this year…

    how nice is that.[/quote]it’s nice to see demidov doing great but I think kapanen is the bigger surprise there. We knew that demidov was a special player but kapanen barely made the team and ended up with demidov by default. Snake a la tete dure parfois(meme si Jaime bien lecouter avec Mathias); mais il devra faire son mea culpa bientot.

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #58036
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    I really don’t mind kapanen playing with demidov and slaf . 13 goals so far.

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #58035
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    for sure. if he’s finally found his mojo, I wonder what they’ll want to do with either Dobes or Fowler…

    if they’re looking to win as many games as possible right now I’d go with Fowler, he looks way more calm and well-positioned, despite being so inexperienced.

    Rest assured chickenman will want Fowler too..[/quote]I guess but would dobes have to be waived first if they send him to Laval? If so, they could lose him for nothing.

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #58028
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    well, after an uninspiring loss yesterday, safe to say that was a much better effort..!! good game! 😄

    10/14 on the road, that’s a passing grade..

    Monty has been better as well. They will need him down the road

    in reply to: Canadiens Inconsistent, But Good Enough #57812
    monsieurchicken
    Participant

    Hutson looked really bad on that play and its 2-0 Blues.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 698 total)
Scroll to Top