Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Rhodes vs Rhodes? Cody vs his bother?
Oops meant reigns vs Rhodes
Not at this time
Also, never!
What’s your take on drew winning the title?
Transitional is my guess. Rhodes v Rhodes (no title) will probably be the angle. You like the swap?
watching our Habs + stupid laundry
Have a BAFC
yes
Sup, bro?
Watching our leafs, you?
The pk played half the period
Subban?
Jesus Christ..
Give it a shot
I’m good and glad I have no kids to deal with other than my own.
Also, Texy!
Leave it all behind and become my teaching assistant
Hello Paully, how’s things?
First week back from the break. Amazing how the kids can be extra tires and extra annoying simultaneously.
Yourself?
I guess you can’t post 3 times in a row..
Hi
..?
who was I referring to then? loll
The kids they were playing with
pretty cool indeed, you can tell those kids live and breathe for hockey, it’s what they’re all about.
Hutson and Demidov too
I think it just means they both think Danault was a giant baby and left MTL because he had a tantrum, and that there’s a risk that it repeats itself and that he causes trouble once again now lol.
Which wasn’t true. He wanted the same $ he got in LA, but MB refused.
Since he left, “They” had to create a reason for their loyal media arm to convince the fans that Danault leaving was actually good.
