Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Crosby to MTL is happening. (MASH 4)
what’s the return for PIT?
@ Pat : cool pour le podcast, j’aimais bien la formule de processus. Je vais sûrement écouter leur nouveau projet.
pi y pourront pas leur voler leur branding osti… hahaa
mais Processus devrait être pas si pire aussi encore, Martin Therriault y connait quand même son shit.
good enough for me, tks
free is usually a decent deal, yeah.
is this goona be free or we have to pay?
same formula as before, early access for Patreon members and then free a few days later
Of course he will.
I guess he will pick his team and the return will suffer because of it, but if you can get something, get something.
Its not like the Wild is a cup contender this season anyway
en passant je sais pas si t’as vu mais Mathias et le Snake vont encore avoir un podcast finalement, ça commence mardi prochain
????
Caufield for Kaprisov, there you go
ohh so now you’re interested in the “(franker)”…
????meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess (if I had a gun to my head)
meh, yeah. that would be as far as I would go I guess
pretty cool how Caufield’s contract is built, he has a 15-team NTC for 2028-29, a 10-team NTC for 29-30, and a 5-team NTC for 30-31.
yes, it’s also a way to lower the cap. we’ll give less money but we’ll throw in a NMC…
I still don’t like it and would do without.a 10 or 15 team no-trade list is the way to go…
????yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that
not even. you’re fucked. let say a player with a NMC changes is mind and wants to be traded, we saw that often. GMS have no options, they trade the guy.
but that doesn’t work the other way around!!
if you never give NMC… it’s pretty simple. we’re happy, we keep you, we’re not happy we trade you. and the same thing for the player, he can ask for a trade whenever he wants. fair deal for both sides.it’s a leverage given to the player so that he gets to have control over where he plays, for a special talent it’s a pretty standard thing. most NMCs don’t end up in this fucked up situation you’re alluding to.
in Marner’s case they even had time during his contract to trade him before the NMC kicked in, and they decided to stay put, wtf.
I would never as a gm give a NMC. never. nothing good can come of it.
yeah, giving them out like candy is definitely a bad idea, but for certain players I understand why teams would do that. it’s also a matter of mutual confidence, not all players that get a no-movement clause will try to backstab the organization later on lol.
like Marner did?
Toronto was poor asset management due to how the team was built and their stubbornness to stick with the core four, that situation could’ve been avoided had they delt with it earlier.
the way you’re putting it is that players shouldn’t take advantage of their NMC, which was provided to them by the GM when they signed their contract.
and yes Pat is always right
noice…
????
