Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 861 through 870 (of 1,024 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Forwards . . . Lots Of Opportunity #9045
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    i dont see any direction. will know in the next month

    in reply to: The Forwards . . . Lots Of Opportunity #8965
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    flyers and shrewd moves dont go together.

    in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #8950
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    how can you not love the rangers. they have zero issue trading/waiving players. meanwhile it is like pulling teeth to get the flyers to trade their average andy’s

    in reply to: The Forwards . . . Lots Of Opportunity #8841
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    what a shitty lineup and roster this flyers team have assembled.

    if he isn’t traded, brink is a lock for a roster spot. as he should be, not even in question. one of the few I actually like.

    that is not entertaining at all. why would they want to add a depth guy? do they not have enough of those? 1 year deal suppose wont hurt anything.

    in reply to: Pros and Cons of Drafting Brady Martin #8811
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    If Martin has a laughton comparison the flyers are licking their chops and can’t wait to make the pick….

    Not directed at you Bill just tired of hearing how hard danny tried moving up. it is window dressing. rarely happens. if he did a better job as a GM he wouldn’t have had to try to move up.

    if they move up this draft look to vancouver at 15. Thing is what players (york? brink?) would the flyers move that other teams want? pretty much every player is untouchable in the GM’s eyes.

    in reply to: Risk Tolerance at Draft #8679
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    always remember that stupid video of boivin dancing when I here his name.

    what’s the % flyers trade #6 for immediate help at the nhl level.

    in reply to: Risk Tolerance at Draft #8654
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    funny how clarke wanted Rod Brind’Amour, Teemu Selanne, and Jeremy Roenick then settled for Claude. seesm odd as one is not like the other.

    I am on the McQueen at this point. no more safe go for the high end ceiling. Hard to trade into top 10 though they have assets to part with if they want to imo. Especially if they take someone else and McQueen drops. Though don’t think the gm wants to trade his “core” players even though they are nothing special.

    Buffalo needs NHL players now; who on the flyers would interest them? Can see them wanting to move their pick. boston, Utah, nash, seatle all to varying degrees would also possibly move their pick.

    too lazy to look or remember. Do the flyers own any other teams 1st in 2026?

    in reply to: song of the day #8633
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    in reply to: song of the day #8632
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    in reply to: Hague Rumors #8427
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    Andrae has legitimate top 4 potential while Hague does not. The issue with the Flyers is the mix of players. Ristolainen is a mediocre 3rd pair defenseman. It’s not a loss. They don’t have to do anything. They should be tanking for draft capital.

    Please define legit top 4 potential. U have become a HF parrot cliff

Viewing 10 posts - 861 through 870 (of 1,024 total)
Scroll to Top