Rangers Org. Update: Schneider for Wright?

This story is powered by Betalytics — the intelligent platform for sports betting — and by Rude Hockey apparel.

Mollie Walker “reported” in the NY Post on Friday that MSG executive chairman and CEO James Dolan is handing over the day-to-day ownership responsibilities for the New York Rangers to his son Quentin. I use the quotes around “reported” because it’s pretty clear that Mollie was given this story first. For those on X and other platforms wringing their hands or ripping Ms. Walker, is this any different than certain players preferring to talk to certain reporters or James Dolan appearing on Carton and Big Mac for his first public speaking appearance in years? If Larry Brooks had reported this about New York, would the consternation and pushback be the same? 

In the grand scheme of MSG and the Blueshirts, this is somewhat of a paper transaction. Talk to me down the road when the sale and split of the two entities happens, as that may create a bigger change in the structure of both. This change solely relates to the Rangers; the Knicks, which really is James’ baby, remain status quo with Jim Dolan remaining in his executive chairman role. 

“For the Rangers, 32-year-old Quentin Dolan assumes the titles of Rangers president, chief operating officer and alternate governor. Rangers president and general manager Chris Drury will now report to him instead of James Dolan. The hierarchical change does not impact Drury’s responsibilities in hockey operations. Drury will continue to lead all decision-making for the Rangers and work collaboratively with the fourth-oldest of the six Dolan sons.”Quentin has been involved with the overall MSG organization and infrastructure for years, as well as playing a role in the two professional teams for five years.

As the column noted. Quentin’s most notable position was SVP of player performance and science for both the Rangers and Knicks, following various roles at MSG Sports and service on the MSG Sports board of directors since 2021. Part of his responsibilities included overseeing medical, strength and conditioning, nutrition, mental performance and performance data operations for both teams.  

Prior to becoming SVP, Dolan also served as vice president, strategic adviser to the executive chairman, and as investment director. He’s worked progressively closer with his dad over the years. The younger Dolan was heavily involved in the Knicks recently ending their 53-year NBA title drought.  Knicks head coach Mike Brown even gave him a shoutout during a press conference in March for his efforts in piecing together the plan that kept the oft-injured Mitchell Robinson healthy.

An NYU alum — who got his bachelor’s degree in sports and events management — Dolan already has a working relationship with Drury and Rangers head coach Mike Sullivan, which should help ease him into his new responsibilities. Building relationships has been a priority for Dolan, who recognizes the importance of collaboration while instilling a winning culture. Establishing a new culture around the Rangers, who have missed the playoffs each of the past two seasons and are in the midst of a retool, will be a critical first step for Quintin Dolan.

Braden Schneider-Shane Wright

Where there is smoke, sometimes, there is fire. If I had a nickel for every time Schneider’s name was mentioned as being on the block or in a trade rumor, I would be a very wealthy man. The same is true for Wright, almost from the day he slipped in the draft and was selected by Seattle. Wright has been on the block almost forever during his stint with the Kraken?

Could this be a match match in heaven? In full disclosure, I am not a big Wright fan. I personally think he has underachieved and not shown me enough to warrant his high draft selection, with his drop from first overall having a material psychological impact from which he may not have recovered. His stint in Seattle has been pockmarked with disappointments.

The same can be said to a certain extent on Schneider, especially among Rangers fans whose first true exposure to him was seeing JD pump his fists in the draft room when the team traded up to select the blueliner right in front of the Devils. Schneider was solid when first promoted in 2021-22, showing top-four skill during the playoff run. Since then, his play has leveled off at best or declined at worst, especially when compared to expectations. 

On paper, trading Schneider for Wright could solve a problem for both teams. Seattle wants to move on from Wright. He could slot in as New York’s 2C, allowing JT Miller to move back to wing, though Miller wants to remain at center. Wright would provide the team a cost-controlled middle-six center, which is a need, though that would come with the belief that more responsibility would equate to more production.

In the case of Schneider, the acquisitions of Marcus Pettersson and Sean Durzi likely move Schneider to the third line, where he is better suited. Determining the contract to offer the restricted free agent defenseman has been one of the more challenging pieces of the puzzle. His value on the team and in the league is depressed, almost like that of Wright. But a 24-year-old blueliner who can play either side and has upside if his talent can be unlocked has value.

If you ask for my opinion, I would decline that deal, though as noted, I am not a Wright fan. The Rangers still need another top-nine player who can score, as that is where the team lacks depth. Don’t be shocked if Anthony Mantha or Michael Bunting is inked to a one-year deal if a trade is not made. Plus, I want to see if Schneider can recapture his 2021-22 form.

Home Forums Rangers Org. Update: Schneider for Wright?

Viewing 9 posts - 11 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
  • Author
    Posts
  • #77297
    Reissem11
    Participant

    A bit early to say if Kreider will fetch a first or not. If he is having a great year, maybe? Far from certain.

    “They’re just prospects”, but you are also mad that Drury is trading picks which are just that, for proven players? Our D was a disaster last year. He addressed that. The new 2nd pair + hopefully a full year of Fox should result in a big improvement.

    Did Drury show you his hand in the Doro trade? I didn’t see 1 person linking him to the NYR. And I thought that was a home run trade especially when you look at some other trades (like McTavish).

    I thought the Trocheck trade was fair value, and from what I have read it seems we made out better by taking Greentree over the actual 1st we may have been able to get from LA if we didnt get him. He’s been incredible in the OHL

    Overall, I thought Drury did a decent job this offseason and I am willing to give this team a chance before writing them off as non playoff contenders. I’ve also heard rumors that Drury is targeting another forward. Wonder who it could be

    #77283
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    It’s not misleading IMO. Those deals, especially the Panarin and Trocheck deals should have included a 1st on top of the prospect. Because at the end of the day, they’re just that, a prospect. Drury showed his hand in every deal (when dealing players away) and the results speak for themselves. If ANA has a down season, do you think they won’t get a 1st at the deadline for Kreider?

    We’ve depleted our draft capital and traded away valuable assets for Pennie’s on the dollar bc Drury announced to the entire league he wanted these players off his roster. No one is paying a premium when they know Drury wants them gone at all costs. Usually a bad business strategy to let the person you’re negotiating with know your plan.

    #77282
    Reissem11
    Participant

    I agree that not every trade has resulted in the best return. But to say we didn’t get any first round picks back in all of those trades is a bit misleading IMO. Liam Greentree & Cole Beaudoin are recent first round picks. So yes we didnt select them, but I am excited for both and think they deepen our prospect pool.

    It sucks we dealt some future first round picks. Felt a bit like the Sather days lol. I do think this team is much more competitive than last year, though. I like Durzi & Petterson for our second pair and I think having two strong puck moving D men will be noticeable relatively quickly. I also think injuries really hurt them last year. A full year of Fox + Igor, and I think we have a damn good shot at competing for a playoff spot

    #77215
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    It just amazes me that we always have to add, always have to give up a 1st, always get a crap return. There’s just always a reason why we lose on all these trades.

    Kreider Trouba Kakko Panarin Trocheck. Not a single first round pick came back our way. Yet Drury has no problem throwing 1sts all over the place to get guys on expiring contracts, 30+ year olds etc etc.

    He can careless about the future of this organization and is only worried about saving his own job, bc if this all fails he won’t be here to see it anyway. He’s the worst GM in the league, I can’t think of a team that’s had a worse 5 years since he’s taken over than this organization. From yearly cup contender to last place in the East and a bottom 10 prospect pool to add to it with little draft capital.

    He’s put this organization in a very bad spot for the future.

    1 for 1, I guess I do it bc of the positional need, but if we start adding picks/prospects then it just wasn’t meant to be. Next.

    #77201
    Greschnergy4
    Participant

    If we have to add, I think I’d just keep Schneider.

    I kind of agree or at least understand – I would add a “Morrow type” because of our need for center depth (as we know JT will miss 20 games) is greater than their need for RHD upside… i think. I hate Drury as much as the next guy but we cant shoot him if he adds to get wright as it appears to be the market- maybe Jan knows better?

    #77196
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    If we have to add, I think I’d just keep Schneider.

    #77192
    Greschnergy4
    Participant

    It’s an interesting trade, 1 for 1, not sure I do it. You’re trading more of a known for more of an unknown with higher upside.

    If I had to I think I’d do it because the upside could be massive to go along with the desperate need for centers in this organization. I’d feel a little better if we got something added, but I think the 1 for 1 is fair.

    I think the expert consensus is that we have to add not them. Just saying.

    #77159
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    It’s an interesting trade, 1 for 1, not sure I do it. You’re trading more of a known for more of an unknown with higher upside.

    If I had to I think I’d do it because the upside could be massive to go along with the desperate need for centers in this organization. I’d feel a little better if we got something added, but I think the 1 for 1 is fair.

    #77131
    airjan23
    Participant

    This story is powered by Betalytics — the intelligent platform for sports betting — and by Rude Hockey apparel. https://twitter.com/HockeyHStove/sta
    [See the full post at: Rangers Org. Update: Schneider for Wright?]

Viewing 9 posts - 11 through 19 (of 19 total)
Scroll to Top