- This topic has 457 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 10 hours, 21 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
because the coach doesn’t trust them! and better ones will take their spot (Engstrom, Reinbacher…)
and yes, it is imperative to win a cup. your 3rd pairing must be physical and able to play on the PK, something Marty so far never did with Struble and wifi. he plays Matheson 25 min instead. that’s why I proposed wifi in a trade for a #2C, while he still has some value. if they’re not gonna dress him… might as well gett something in return, no?yeah, they may not be getting the ice time you’d give them, but both are regulars in the lineup, it isn’t like they were both constantly healthy scratches….
this is what I meant earlier, it isn’t because MSL doesn’t like or trust them, but they do have flaws they need to work on to deserve additional ice time imho.
hey do have flaws they need to work on to deserve additional ice time imho
yep, but difficult to do when you play 10 min per game.
very curious to watch Engstrom tonight, I like him.yep, but difficult to do when you play 10 min per game.
very curious to watch Engstrom tonight, I like him.I get what you’re saying, but players need to make the most of what’s given to them.
yeah, interesting call-up for Engstrom, even if he doesn’t stay long-term he could definitely become alluring trade bait.
I get what you’re saying, but players need to make the most of what’s given to them.
yeah, interesting call-up for Engstrom, even if he doesn’t stay long-term he could definitely become alluring trade bait.
true, can’t say they did.
who knows? Engstrom could do very well and push others out the door.
who knows? Engstrom could do very well and push others out the door
oh that too… this is what’s nice of having actual quality prospects within your organization, it gives you way more possibilities, and it pressures everyone into being better.
I get what you’re saying, but players need to make the most of what’s given to them.
yeah, interesting call-up for Engstrom, even if he doesn’t stay long-term he could definitely become alluring trade bait.
true, can’t say they did.
who knows? Engstrom could do very well and push others out the door.
then we get even softer
then we get even softer
well that depends who Engstrom pushes out, technically since he’s more of a puck-moving dman he’d be making a guy like Matheson more expendable, not a Struble or a Xhekaj…
then we get even softer
well that depends who Engstrom pushes out, technically since he’s more of a puck-moving dman he’d be making a guy like Matheson more expendable, not a Struble or a Xhekaj…
ah yes valid point
I hope they adress the need for size, before our next playoffs !
I hope they adress the need for size, before our next playoffs !
yeah as I said earlier, I really doubt Hughes and Gorton don’t already have this in mind, they seem to know what they’re doing so I’m confident they won’t be going with an all-skill soft-as-butter roster to try to win lol.
that goalie is making me thirsty
I guess Texier will be in for Davidson next game, question is do you bring back wifi ?
personally I’d prefer having him in the lineup against a bigger team like Vegas
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.