Flyers Off Season Discussion:

Home Forums Philadelphia Flyers Flyers Off Season Discussion:

Viewing 10 posts - 291 through 300 (of 646 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
  • Author
    Posts
  • #17052
    VonZipper
    Participant

    Bill, I haven’t been paying close attention lately but I see there is a new CBA agreement. I heard in passing that there is a cap in the play-offs now?? Is there indeed one?
    Any other highlights to mention? Anything new with players going to college (i.e. Cutter)?

    Here’s Bill’s rundown on the new CBA: https://hockeyhotstove.com/forums/topic/new-cba/

    #17046
    Baphomet
    Participant

    Bill, I haven’t been paying close attention lately but I see there is a new CBA agreement. I heard in passing that there is a cap in the play-offs now?? Is there indeed one?
    Any other highlights to mention? Anything new with players going to college (i.e. Cutter)?

    #16999
    FlyerFrank
    Participant

    I truly hope you are right. I do not believe the path the Flyers have chosen will yield real success.

    Briere is making the calls, so I hope he’s right. As an outside observer, the moves make sense to me and I think they’ll work out. We’re not even talking about injuries and other mishaps that can derail any plan. My bar is pretty low for this year. I want to be entertained. That’s it. I have little concern for the future, although again, I think the moves for the future make sense to me.

    #16989
    mickel25
    Participant

    I did not move anything. All of those teams had a #1 C and D. My point is the cost of acquiring one or both of those pieces is far less when drafting in the top five. You can get them outside of the top 5 but the percentages are against that.

    Here’s what you initially wrote. You’re seriously backpedaling:

    “The real issue is that they picked in the top 5 once in the last seven drafts. Picking once in the top five in 7 drafts is not going to get you the players you need to win a Stanley Cup. Even when you factor in the gift that Michkov turned out to be. Having a deep team is a good thing. I think they will get there on that front. If you are fine with that then so be it. I am a firm believer that you need top level talent at C and D to win in this league.”

    The draft is not the only way to get a top #1 Dman or #1 center. FLA did get that through the draft but they built most of the rest of the team through trades and free agency.

    Getting top level players via UFA requires those players to be available first and foremost. That is pretty rare. You also need to have cap space which the Flyers never seem to have. That situation looks better going into next year but let’s see what they do with it and if any of those types of players are available. Again low probability of that.

    The Flyers had some cap space this off season and will have more next season. Top players do move through UFA.

    Getting top level players via trade requires that you have top assets to move. The Flyers really do not have any top level assets they can afford to move at this point.

    We agree on that. Trade talk and the Flyers is a fool’s errand. Briere did pull a rabbit out of a hat with Zegras. Trades remain tricky.

    The Flyers rarely pick in the top five. So the chances of landing top level players is lower. They also are not acquiring desirable assets to include in trade for top level players. They never have cap space to get top level players via UFA and when/if they do those players are rarely available. The Flyers have not utilized RFA recently either. So how are they getting top level players? Not good (TK, Sanheim) players. Top level (MacKinnon, Makar) players. Having a bunch of middle six players is great if you have legitimate top line players. Having a bunch of middle six players and forcing five of them to play above their capabilities is not.

    Konecny and Sanheim are both excellent players. You don’t get chosen to the Canadian national team by being not good. The issue the Flyers have is building around the spotty good they do have.

    I truly hope you are right. I do not believe the path the Flyers have chosen will yield real success.

    #16939
    FlyerFrank
    Participant

    Then why aren’t the flyers building around those 2?

    Of course they are. The guys with the longer term contracts are the guys they’re looking to build around. Money, and term, talks.

    https://puckpedia.com/team/philadelphia-flyers

    #16918
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    Are those 2, guys you can currently build around to become cup contenders?

    Neither are what anyone would call superstars but yes. You can continue to build a cup contending team around those guys. As an example, the last time the Flyers went to the finals, Richards was their 1C and his scoring numbers were never elite. A couple seasons he did hit 1 PPG. Up to that season, Kimmo had been their #1 Dman. A fine Dman but they went out and added Pronger and got to the finals that year. I’m not a big fan of “the core isn’t good enough” argument. The core is what you’ve got and the Flyers have plenty of holes and question marks before even worrying about if the 1C and 1D are good enough.

    Then why aren’t the flyers building around those 2?

    #16892
    FlyerFrank
    Participant

    Are those 2, guys you can currently build around to become cup contenders?

    Neither are what anyone would call superstars but yes. You can continue to build a cup contending team around those guys. As an example, the last time the Flyers went to the finals, Richards was their 1C and his scoring numbers were never elite. A couple seasons he did hit 1 PPG. Up to that season, Kimmo had been their #1 Dman. A fine Dman but they went out and added Pronger and got to the finals that year. I’m not a big fan of “the core isn’t good enough” argument. The core is what you’ve got and the Flyers have plenty of holes and question marks before even worrying about if the 1C and 1D are good enough.

    #16886
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    Konecny and Sanheim are both excellent players. You don’t get chosen to the Canadian national team by being not good. The issue the Flyers have is building around the spotty good they do have.[/quote]

    Are those 2, guys you can currently build around to become cup contenders?

    #16885
    yes its me 2050
    Participant

    Top 20 drafted NHL goalie prospects ranking: Askarov, Fowler lead Wheeler’s summer 2025 list

    Zavragin ranked #17

      Top-10

    1. Askarov
    2. Fowler
    3. Augustine
    4. Yegorov
    5. Ravensbergen
    6. Andreyanov
    7. Levi
    8. Cossa
    9. Hrabal
    10. Ivankovic

    I have been banging the Fowler drum for years

    #16880
    Tomahawk
    Participant

    Top 20 drafted NHL goalie prospects ranking: Askarov, Fowler lead Wheeler’s summer 2025 list

    Zavragin ranked #17

      Top-10

    1. Askarov
    2. Fowler
    3. Augustine
    4. Yegorov
    5. Ravensbergen
    6. Andreyanov
    7. Levi
    8. Cossa
    9. Hrabal
    10. Ivankovic

Viewing 10 posts - 291 through 300 (of 646 total)
Scroll to Top