- This topic has 2,683 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 2 hours, 35 minutes ago by
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
Posts
-
Did he predict all the injuries, which has been one of the main drivers for the leafs lack of success?
He simply whined about baby marner turning down the leafs good offer to run away to vegas.Yes, I actually did. I’ve been saying since day 1 Tanev is a huge injury risk with a trash contract. I did predict Woll and Stolarz injuries, as if that wasn’t obvious.
You’re just an illiterate libtard with a selective cuck memory.
How is Vegas doing? Oh right beat the Leafs twice despite having a multitude of injuries so much so it forced Marner to play center and using 4 or 5 different starting goalies this year. How was Marner last year when Matthews / the goalies werr hurt? Oh right 103 points and 1st in the division. Damn, must suck for you to be too retarded to realize why this team fell off a cliff.
could the Leafs squeeze Edmonton for a 1st rnd pck (2027) and a prospect for McMann?
it was suggested it would at least a 2nd rnd pck and a prospect for him.for me, you are punting the issue to a later date with no protection on the pick.
If the Leafs can finish between the 11th and 16th pick would be better IMO.
For me, you keep Laughton unless his salary demands are too high for his next contract. (4yrs @2.5~3M cap hit)[/quote]Agreed, you are punting the issue but you may be punting a worse pick for the team. I dont want to provide the team with a top 16 pick which seems to be what they will be getting now.
I could easily be talked into keeping Laughton for at 2.5 – 3m per, give him a letter and least you are not losing the asset you trade a 1st and prospect forOk time to sell, sell, sell, sell.
Too many injuries and simple lack of heart and effort to get into the playoffs
Bottom out for a top five pick or simply sell any FA’s.
Laughton for a 2nd – which is all he should have been traded for all you’re going to get now.
Maccelli – 3rd
Jarnkrok – 4th or 5th
Robertson – 3rd.I doubt either of the above gets a 1st, unless the leafs are trading with the leafs.[/quote]
for me, you are punting the issue to a later date with no protection on the pick.
If the Leafs can finish between the 11th and 16th pick would be better IMO.
For me, you keep Laughton unless his salary demands are too high for his next contract. (4yrs @2.5~3M cap hit)Maaaan this site is absolutely brutal! How are you guys even using it? Took forever to load, login, now post.
UG, you through so much spaghetti to the wall, some of it bound to stick.
Moving players above 25 is not wise.[/quote]
Did he predict all the injuries, which has been one of the main drivers for the leafs lack of success?
He simply whined about baby marner turning down the leafs good offer to run away to vegas.I knew this team was medicore to bad but it’s especially embarassing to shit the bed, at home, to Buffalo, a team they’re chasing for a playoff spot on a night where they honor Sittler. Fucking disgusting. And these retards paying retarded prices for tickets were booing Marner? Boo yourself for supporting this trash.
Ok time to sell, sell, sell, sell.
Too many injuries and simple lack of heart and effort to get into the playoffs
Bottom out for a top five pick or simply sell any FA’s.
Laughton for a 2nd – which is all he should have been traded for all you’re going to get now.
Maccelli – 3rd
Jarnkrok – 4th or 5th
Robertson – 3rd.I doubt either of the above gets a 1st, unless the leafs are trading with the leafs.
Called it back in November.
UG, you through so much spaghetti to the wall, some of it bound to stick.
Moving players above 25 is not wise.
