Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 257 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66799
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Being that MN doesn’t have a 1st…..

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66765
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I read an article where Emily Kaplan was saying drury backed himself into a corner with a lot of these trades and gms not willing to overpay because he showed what he was doing. Said he made a tough situation for himself

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66750
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Aecliptic, no. But Roy gets a 1st, we get garbage for Panarin. Carrick for a 3rd and 6th. wtf is that. Mccarron got a 2nd. I would’ve kept Carrick for a 3rd and 6th, garbage return yet again.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66692
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Maloney, “the contending teams blue lines are on the bigger side rather than the smaller side”

    I’ve been saying this forever!!!!

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66689
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I logged out, logged back in, and the new forum was there. I commented in the forum, left. Came back on the site, and now that forum isn’t there anymore even though I know it is bc I commented in it.

    U guys just want to make a discord or something to talk hockey? This is insanity

    in reply to: Jan Levine — Rangers: OT Loss, Trade Deadline, Miller #66685
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I had to log out, then log back in, and now this forum appears. If I just stay logged in, nothing updates on this site.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66658
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Roy got a 1st. Insane how bad Drury is at trading

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66618
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Is not. This is the only forum for the last month+. I posted in a blog a couple blogs ago and got a response from Bill but he seemed aggravated with what I said. Jan said he’d make sure each blog has a forum, but that has yet to happen. Then someone said they’re having issues with the forums they’re trying to resolve. This site is somehow worse than the buzz. I want it to succeed and have offered multiple suggestions, but not a single thing has changed. Very difficult to have flowing conversation on here.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66445
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Regarding the Trocheck trade, we HAVE to hit a home run. We also don’t have to trade him if the return isn’t there. No need to make a trade just to make a trade. Let’s see what the moron does

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66434
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    The wild have nothing to offer. No 1st this year and no 2nd for the next 3 years. Yurov doesn’t move the needle enough for me. I want a trade with DET TB or BOS.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66396
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I’ve been saying for a while Carrick would get us a 2nd. 1st is a stretch, I’d be happy with a 2nd. He should be the one getting the Steven McDonald award also this year, no one on the team more deserving.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66388
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I’d say the K Miller trade was good/fair value. Same could be said for the Lindgren trade.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66361
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Don’t forget the great Vaakaneien.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66321
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Sullivan was the wrong coach also. This team is terrible, unfortunately Drury has traded Trouba Kreider Panarin for peanuts. That will hurt in the long term on this “retool”. He’s a clown

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66291
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    This place is a ghost town

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 257 total)
Scroll to Top