Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 249 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67153
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Kreider would on pace for 57 pts and 31 goals this season if he played a full 82 games. The fact Drury traded that for a 3rd round pick is absolutely insane. The more I think about the position he’s put this franchise in the more aggravated I get he still has a job. And even firing him, the damage is done. He has destroyed this team for years to come.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67028
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I talked about Belchetz about a month ago, I’d love to get that kid

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66999
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Aecliptic. I don’t disagree about not trading him if the right deal wasn’t in place. But you don’t go announce to the league you’re going to trade him, hold him out of the lineup, and then not trade him. You don’t send a letter out saying you’re retooling, and your retool consists of (3) 3rd round picks, (1) 6th round pick and a prospect.

    I’m opposed to trading Schneider, and don’t like we traded Othmann. He trades for these bums, Borgen, Uro, Parsenin etc, his value of players is then worst in the league. He needs to be gone. Based on how he values players, he probably had a home run package and turned it down bc of how he views players based on past trades. Blais, Brisson, the list goes on and on.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66901
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Another 1st round forward that failed to develop under drury

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66881
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I hate this guy man. Absolutely hate him

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66866
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Official?

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66851
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    If kotkoniemi is the main piece coming back ……

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66799
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Being that MN doesn’t have a 1st…..

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66765
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I read an article where Emily Kaplan was saying drury backed himself into a corner with a lot of these trades and gms not willing to overpay because he showed what he was doing. Said he made a tough situation for himself

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66750
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Aecliptic, no. But Roy gets a 1st, we get garbage for Panarin. Carrick for a 3rd and 6th. wtf is that. Mccarron got a 2nd. I would’ve kept Carrick for a 3rd and 6th, garbage return yet again.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66692
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Maloney, “the contending teams blue lines are on the bigger side rather than the smaller side”

    I’ve been saying this forever!!!!

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66689
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I logged out, logged back in, and the new forum was there. I commented in the forum, left. Came back on the site, and now that forum isn’t there anymore even though I know it is bc I commented in it.

    U guys just want to make a discord or something to talk hockey? This is insanity

    in reply to: Jan Levine — Rangers: OT Loss, Trade Deadline, Miller #66685
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I had to log out, then log back in, and now this forum appears. If I just stay logged in, nothing updates on this site.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66658
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Roy got a 1st. Insane how bad Drury is at trading

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66618
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Is not. This is the only forum for the last month+. I posted in a blog a couple blogs ago and got a response from Bill but he seemed aggravated with what I said. Jan said he’d make sure each blog has a forum, but that has yet to happen. Then someone said they’re having issues with the forums they’re trying to resolve. This site is somehow worse than the buzz. I want it to succeed and have offered multiple suggestions, but not a single thing has changed. Very difficult to have flowing conversation on here.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 249 total)
Scroll to Top