Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Would he consider the Leafs and I wonder if he up to the task?
3rd line C????????Doubt it. Jets probably.
Florida off to the Final again. 3rd year in a row. Scored 5+ goals in 4 out of 5 games.
Leafs, as flawed as they were, took this team to Game 7.
Leafs would’ve won if Stolarz didn’t get injured, and if the passenger wasn’t being a passenger.
Woll was more than fine. The Panthers would have blown Stolarz out of the net eventually. They knew all of his weaknesses having had taken shots on him all of last year. Stolarz was on the way down statistically anyway, his injury was a terrible event but he wouldn’t have won the series by himself. There were multiple games where the Leafs couldn’t score more than 1 goal. Unless Stolarz pitches literal shutouts or starts scoring goals, his absence wasn’t the reason they lost.
I’m not choosing to get rid of Marner, I’m of the opinion that he has no interest in returning and I’m further of the opinion that the Leafs have little interest in him taking up nearly 15% of the cap. The problem isn’t solely Marner, it’s general construction when you have too many guys providing too few 50/50 wins – Marner, Matthews, Nylander, Domi, Tavares, Rielly, Robertson, Holmberg – and the guys they were paying specifically to win those types of battles in Kampf and Jarnkrok – all lost way more than they won.
The amount of money you need to keep Marner at even 13 million, is found when you get rid of Rielly and Tavares. I’ll take the 100 point player in his prime over the two guys on the wrong side of 30 who absolutely suck defensively every, single, time. It’s not just about next year, it’s about the next 4-5 years. Marner gives us more chances at 27 to win than Tavares at 35+ and Rielly at 31+.
You continue to be of the opinion that an NMC isn’t an obstacle but it can be. That list of assumptions is based on logical expectation – Rielly, Nylander and Matthews all have NMCs. Would it be preferable to trade Nylander and keep Marner? Maybe – but it would be difficult, probably not return a fair return, and continue to keep too much high end imbalance against the cap. At some point it’s not about 1 player. It’s about reconstructing the team to win more of those battles. So if you need top-end talent to go and you need to throw out some of the low-end guys who also aren’t cutting it and you end up losing Marner, Tavares, Robertson, Holmberg, Jarnkrok and Kampf and bring in guys who win pucks – like Marchand, Smith, Bennett, Tanev and Suter – you’re better off for it. If Tavares is affordable, he presents decent offense – especially if he has someone on his line who can provide physicality and win pucks – so I don’t discount him returning, because he has value.
NMC is an obvious obstacle. It just isn’t an insurmountable obstacle. It exists to give the players an opinion on the matter of where they land. But when a team goes to a player and says “we don’t want you here anymore”, they eventually will move on.
As a hypothetical, yes, Nylander being traded is better than Marner walking as a UFA. But that would never be my plan A. It would be much more preferable to move the rest of the dead money and keep Nylander.
This is where a Sam Bennett comes in. Yeah, Tavares does suck defensively – but most of it comes from having him not play centre. Put him on the wing where he can perform a decent role and give him someone who will win pucks and be physical and both he and Nylander would benefit. It’s like having Pacioretty on steroids.
I’m all for winning more battles. But we have to realize that the guys we want will not come here.
I don’t see Tavares as having value at anything over 3 million. Look at Duchene in Dallas. Tavares requires more money than he saves in line mates just to have him break even. And he’s only going to get worse as he ages. Tavares, at his best, didn’t get the job done. I don’t see how his pajamas are going to get the job done at 35+.
Does he want to come here? Word is that Bennett has only two destinations in mind – Florida and Toronto. So yeah, there’s a chance. Similarly with Marchand – he wants an east coast contender, so he can play at a high level and be near family. Toronto, Florida and Tampa would all fit that bill nicely for him.
The “word” is Bennett needs another team to leverage to get a better deal from Florida. His team has gone to the Cup Final twice in a row, won a Cup, might win another, has better weather, better taxes, less pressure and a better team. Sorry to say but Bennett actually coming to Toronto is less than 5% likely. He’d have to be an absolute moron to leave his situation to join the Leafs. Additionally, given his style and his age, can the Leafs really afford to spend 7.5+ long term on a guy who is going to be signed until 35 with a career high of 51 points? I loved the idea of adding Sam Bennett when he was in Calgary because he would cost nothing to acquire and his best years were ahead of him. But Bennett at 30+ looks like a Clarkson, Simmonds trap the Leafs have fallen into many times before.
Knies is coming in over $7m and has earned it. $7.5m is the new $6.4m and a 22 year old who just put him 29 goals and 58 points fits into that range. Keller signed for $7.2m coming in with worse numbers – and that equates to $8.4m in a $95.5m cap world.
Leafs have to play harder ball than that. A long term deal makes no sense given he’s only played two seasons and he has the benefit of playing with elite players. If the idea is to let Marner walk for nothing and then sign a player Marner directly helped to score as many goals and points as he did, this team really does want to implode. What happens when Knies gets 7.5 AAV, Marner leaves and Knies only scores 15 goals? Knies should be signed to a 3 year deal and he can get Domi’s salary when his contract expires. Knies reaches UFA status faster, the Leafs get a discount and more time to see if Knies deserves a big, long term contract when he proves it.
Lorentz played for $775k last year but he did leave money on the table and while I suspect he’d do so again, he’s a very effective bottom-6 player who can PK very well – among leaf penalty killing forwards, he led the team in both GA/60 and xGA/60. He deserves a raise and he’s a player the team would do well to keep.
Not really since Kampf played 1 atrocious game, and Lorentz played all 13, and was still the top guy in xGA/60 on the PK. You need role players and you need guys who win battles – Lorentz is both.
I like Lorentz but he still had 0 playoff goals. What he “deserves” is a lot different than what sacrifice he wants to make to stay on the Leafs, a team he clearly wants to play and win a Cup for. He can make more money and play somewhere else, or he can play for the Leafs. He has to decide one or the other but can’t have both. We made this same mistake with Kampf in years prior. And that didn’t end well for us. If the Leafs have to overpay their stars to stay, they can’t afford to keep 4th liners for anything other than league minimum. You can afford to lose a player like Lorentz. Bring in Max Comtois for league minimum. I’m sure he’d be happy to be back in the NHL. There are other options for lunch pail 4th liners than there is for any other role.
At the end of the day, my post was basically about what you have. If I was remaking the lines, and going with a combination of what I’d like to do combined with the challenges I think they face (like losing Marner), I’d probably think this way:
I agree we need to change the battle winners but it can’t come at the expense of losing Marner. And that is a major difference.
Knies – Matthews – Domi
Tavares – Bennett – Nylander
Marchand – Faksa/Suter – McMann
Lorentz – Laughton – TanevYour top-3 lines all have size, board battle, shooting, net presence and passing. The 4th line is an energy puck hound line. As I said, I want more compete and I want a metric fuckton more 50/50 wins.
I just don’t see Tavares as good enough to be on this team, would rather have Reilly Smith for the same price and probably play the role better.
Bennett and Marchand are not leaving Florida for the Leafs. They’d have to be idiots.
Don’t see McMann as part of a winning solution after his 0 goal playoff run. Would rather use his current value to trade him for a guy who throws 300-400 hits, maybe bring in a Jack McBain type for his spot on the 3rd line.
Out: McMann, Jarnkrok, Kampf, Rielly, Holmberg and Robertson.
Knies | Matthews | Marner
Smith | Jenner | Nylander
Domi | McBain | B. Tanev
Laughton | Blueger | Lorentz
ComtoisOEL | Tanev
McCabe | Carlo
Dumoulin | Tyler Myers
BenoitWoll | Stolarz
Ah, yes they do. Not often but they do happen.
Winnipeg and LA Kings for Dubois
I think the Matthew Tkachuk, trade might of been one.Ah, no, they don’t.
Sorry bud but Dubois was an RFA, not a pending UFA.
Tkachuk did not do a sign and trade as a pending UFA either.
That’s a hard pass for me. Can’t be paying a guy 15% of the cap to disappear when the games mean something*
*Yes, I understand we’re paying 2 other players that kind of money to have the same results, but what’s done is done. -WHIPPER
Really? Because that’s factually inaccurate. Marner helped win 2 out of the 3 games against Florida, one with a GWG and the other with a primary assist in Game 6 for the GWG. Matthews had a GWG in Game 6. Knies had a GWG too. It was actually Tavares and Nylander who did next to nothing when the games mattered. And they were on the ice for A LOT of goals against. More than any other forward. Those are the real guys who disappeared.
So…your argument doesn’t hold water.
You’re also unlikely to find guys who actually want to come to Toronto who will be better than Marner for that 15% cap hit.
At least in the scenario where you sign Marner and trade Nylander, you get something in return for Nylander. It’s basic asset management.
Luckily, if they dump Tavares and Rielly, they can keep both, which would be the best course of action.
Tre has a press conference tomorrow, what could that possibly be for?!?!
Announce Marner’s team-friendly $10Mx8!!!
8 years, 13.16 AAV. Kampf has been traded for future considerations to accommodate the increase.
This is what gets me. For me, this is a huge assumption. Just because he’s from that area doesn’t mean he would want to play there. I get it, playing closer to were he grew up.
Marner did decline to waive his nmc. So players don’t always say yes.I don’t think it’s that huge of an assumption. When a player has a career crisis, going back home can help them reset and bring comfort. If he has kids, his family can help raise them. Makes his life easier. Brings familiarity to his life. That’s why I also said Seattle, because if Vancouver doesn’t work, there’s another area that is also close that can bring similar benefits.
For Marner, it was the opposite scenario. He wants to stay close to home, not move far away from it. The Leafs were given an offer, they did their due diligence and asked Marner. They didn’t shop him out of town during the offseason. It’s a different scenario. Marner didn’t want to be a rental, didn’t want to go away from home and didn’t want to leave the team he felt he helped build. Rielly, being asked to waive, is a reset for him, not a last minute decision.
This is a no brainer as there are 21 teams they can trade them to. I’d keep Jarnkrok 2.1M for next year for a 2nd/3rd line guy is ok but if you get something better than he could be included in a bigger deal. Let’s say the Leafs do a sign and trade with Vegas Marner 11.5 x 8 nmc + Jarnkrok for Karlsson + Whitecloud. Not saying this will happen or anything like that
Jarnkrok is garbage in the playoffs. I’m sorry, but he has how many career playoff goals? 5 in 105 games? He is the wrong player for this team. He’s fine in Nashville or Columbus or any other team fighting for 8th place. But he’s not a playoff guy. He needs to go away and be replaced. I’d rather have two guys making 1 million each who throw 200 hits each rather than have Jarnkrok at 2+ AAV. If we have guys who won’t score, at least have monsters who hit.
Marner is not doing any sign and trades. He either re-signs or he leaves with his middle fingers up. Sign and trades happen in the NBA, not in the NHL.
you are going to need to get some players to waive their n-mtc or nmc to which I do not see happening.
NTC and NMC are waived every single year. They always have. They always will. Including giant contracts like Karlsson if a 3rd party retains salary, if necessary, which helps some teams reach the new 70 million dollar cap floor without paying real dollars.
When a team decides, this player has to go away, the player is not going to dig their heels in and say “never”. They pick the teams they would accept to.
For example, Rielly. Am I suggesting we trade him to San Jose? No. But Vancouver or Seattle? He would accept. They are capable of making the playoffs and he’s originally from BC. That’s not a scenario where he would say no to.
Same goes for Jarnkrok, Kampf etc. These guys have limited NTC. The list of teams they can be sent to is longer than the ones they can’t.
Players accept trades, it’s just a matter of finding them a place they are okay with going to. It’s a process but not an impossible one.
