Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I get what you’re saying but I still think that won’t truly solve the backend. Guys don’t get NMCs just because of hockey reasons. Rielly doesn’t want to go anywhere because his wife is from London and hey live full time in Toronto. Tanev probably doesn’t want to finish his career anywhere else either since he’s from Toronto. So they could start blowing the team up but they’d still have to wait things out with guys like them because the NMC has nothing to do with the team and just them not wanting to move.
Hockey is hockey but to a player it’s still just a job and their personal lives matter more so a blow up would not be easy.
The idea of playing for the “hometown Leafs” is a Stanley Cup feeling of accomplishment in itself. Once these guys have done it for a year or two, that feeling fades and reality sets in.
The NMC is to guarantee they decide where they land. I don’t give a fuck what players say, at the end of the day, winning and money is usually what matters most. The old guys on this team have their money. They can fly “home” whenever the fuck they want the rest of the year. Tanev would rather win a Cup than ride out his last days playing on a shit team in Toronto. These guys signed here because they were grossly overpaid and had the thought they could win in Toronto. If Matthews is gone, that illusion of winning in Toronto disappears and the rats flee the ship. That includes Tavares and everybody else. If given a chance to join a contender and the Leafs are rebuilding, they will go. It’s just a matter of the Leafs deciding to look to the future.
Oh I get it, and the only way to fix it is to move salary out in a trade to get the cap space and I don’t see that happening. So here’s hoping the old boys find a final season somehow
There is no way to fix it. The D can’t be fixed. It’s not gonna happen. The Leafs are out of assets and draft picks. They need to blow it up and rebuild. Matthews and Nylander would get us a huge return.
Best thing that could happen is Matthews asks for a trade and we start selling high on their top assets.
As I said I get the concerns but I’m simply willing to give him the rope til November because he’s not that far off.
Career SV% in October: 0.902
This year: 0.897It’s not making me feel like that’s all this is, but I can wait another week to see if things start to turn around. Close enough is basically all I’m saying, maybe it’s his age causing him to be 0.005 less.
You also have to remember, Bob is also older and the Leafs D is not only old, but it’s slow and it’s overall bad at keeping shots away. Compared to the way the Panthers the before that the Blue Jackets played D, Bob is going to be expected to do more work than he’s ever had to do before. It’s a tall order.
Actually I’m giving Bobrovsky some rope right now, look it up, he’s notoriously known for being bad in October. This is nothing new for him. Now if this continues through November that will be something different.
The logic is they signed him for the playoffs but if they don’t collect as many points as possible against shit teams, there won’t be playoffs given the division they play in.
The issue with Bob right now seems he’s just a touch too deep and/or a touch off his timing which means those “perfect” shots go in instead of hitting him in the shoulders.
Leafs also allow too many shots against which only makes things worse for struggling goalies.
The Leafs fired a lot of staff but kept their goalie coach, Sanford and I think that was a mistake. They need an upgrade in that department. He has been there since 2022 and their goaltending hasn’t been consistent in that time period.
Come on, Brad Bradford. Kick that piece of Socialist shit to the curb in Toronto. Hopefully, the Leafs wake up.
Toronto lost tonight in so many ways. Absolute retard city.
but we exposed them in EVERY area. Outplayed them on PP, PK, 5v5, tending, vibes, crowd, every single line, absolute masterclass.
Looked like the Flames exposed the Leafs in EVERY area, outplayed them on the PP, PK, 5v5, tending, vibes, crowd, every single line, absolute masterclass.
Who was the retard saying about playing vs. shit teams? Leafs play their worst vs shit teams.
Bob hasn’t been very good either. He’s looking his age right now.
someone got a stream for tonight’s game?
https://isportsurge.shop/?id=calgary-flames-vs-toronto-maple-leafs-2591670
Oh look at mister back peddle now after telling everyone the Dodgers were unbeatable for 2 years now.
You know who was really beatable? The Jays.
After they had a shit offseason and missed the playoffs entirely, a fall from Game 7 grace of the World Series. At least the Dodgers won two in a row and did everything in their power to give their fans a 100+ win team and get back to the NLCS.
Can’t help but notice that you completely ignored your BS claim that Vegas was the best team in the league. They have a WHOPPING 1 point more than the Leafs despite having had the second easiest schedule in the NHL and ranking 9th in injuries while the Leafs are 4th.
Also, the Oilers have had the 3rd easiest schedule to date, so not all that surprising that they’ve dunked on shit teams. Granted, they beat Minnesota and the Canes, but we exposed them in EVERY area. Outplayed them on PP, PK, 5v5, tending, vibes, crowd, every single line, absolute masterclass.
You’re an absolute clown.
Can’t help but notice you’re too retarded to see the part of the sentence that said “so far this year”. I know, reading at a 3rd grade level is hard for you.
Who won between Vegas and the Leafs again? Oh right, Leafs blew a lead and lost. Right. The Leafs haven’t had dog shit teams to play against (at home) too?
Clown is the retard who says the Oilers are a shit team when he can’t realize the Leafs are built exactly the same but with a lesser star player.
The Leafs PK has been elite. But we’ve seen this core group of guys go streaking for years. It’s still October and the Leafs have a long, long way to go no matter how the “vibez” feel unlike teams like Edmonton, Vegas etc. who have proven to go deep into the playoffs while the Leafs were golfing.
