Home › Forums › Chicago Blackhawks › Blackhawks 2025-2026 General Comments
Tagged: blackhawks
- This topic has 1,389 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
Steve from Glencoe.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 11, 2026 at 10:00 am #59254
Earl Camembert
ParticipantMan what a great game by the Bears tonight. That 4th down play was unbelievable to Rome.
Amazing! Bring on whoever!
January 11, 2026 at 12:12 am #59220BetweenTheDots
ParticipantMan what a great game by the Bears tonight. That 4th down play was unbelievable to Rome.
January 10, 2026 at 10:50 pm #59196BetweenTheDots
ParticipantMan what a great game by Commesso. Congrats to the kid first win a shut out.
I still don’t like the Blackhawks lapse of defense inside the right face off dot, fortunately they got away with it tonight
These kids are electric, they gotta remember to play through the opponent not around.
January 10, 2026 at 9:41 pm #59179Earl Camembert
ParticipantGreat point Steve. I’m sure this will be the trade that comes back to haunt the Hawks this year and for many years to come. I know you’re playing the long game on the Jones for Knight trade unlike most of us who have declared it an emphatic win…but is there a trade you approve of from KFC or any other Hawk GM?
January 10, 2026 at 5:26 pm #59105CoachFrenchy
ParticipantI really love the passion each of you brings to this forum about the game we all care about — hockey. Different opinions, agreements, and disagreements about management, coaches, and players are all part of what makes this community interesting and alive.
The most important thing, however, is respect for one another. Healthy debate is a good thing, and having many voices and viewpoints keeps the forum active and engaging.
I read all of your posts, but as a writer, I usually choose not to reply so I can stay focused on writing articles almost every day. That said, your discussions matter, and they help shape the conversation around the team.
If you have any feedback or suggestions, feel free to share them. I’m always open to hearing your thoughts.
Thanks for keeping the discussions going and the passion strong.
January 10, 2026 at 5:02 pm #59103Dionysus
ParticipantEarl, if the Hawks miss the playoffs by a couple of points. Remember that NHL playoff contenders keep a veteran goalie around for emergencies. KD traded his insurance policy to meet the cap floor a couple of days before he needed him.
Davidson is wayyyy out of his league.
January 10, 2026 at 4:13 pm #59091Steve from Glencoe
ParticipantEarl, if the Hawks miss the playoffs by a couple of points. Remember that NHL playoff contenders keep a veteran goalie around for emergencies. KD traded his insurance policy to meet the cap floor a couple of days before he needed him.
January 9, 2026 at 7:43 pm #58952Earl Camembert
ParticipantComparing to last season sounds like when my wife tells me that she saved money by buying something for 40% off.
Who you crapping Steve, if they had a worse record this season compared to last it would be your main argument.
I now understand when someone applies logic, deflect, deflect, deflect
Why meet logic with logic when you can dodge, duck, dip, dive…dodge. Still pretty sure Steve’s a Blue’s fan troll.
January 9, 2026 at 7:24 pm #58951BetweenTheDots
ParticipantComparing to last season sounds like when my wife tells me that she saved money by buying something for 40% off.
Who you crapping Steve, if they had a worse record this season compared to last it would be your main argument.
I now understand when someone applies logic, deflect, deflect, deflect
January 9, 2026 at 6:06 pm #58947Metalhead
ParticipantWeighing in on Reichel/Chinakhov (though I’ll probably regret it 🤣)
Lucas Reichel has recently proven to be nearly worthless in trade value.
The Hawks traded him for a 4th round pick.
He played 14 games for VAN, with 1 assist and no goals.
Vancouver, besides having the 2nd worst pts % in the league, is a struggling franchise lately.
Even so, they did not value him enough to keep him on the roster.
They put him through waivers, and all 31 other teams, who could have had him for free declined to take him.As for their point totals:
In their most recent 82 NHL games:
Reichel has 27 points, or 0.33ppg. (27 pts per full season)
Chinakhov has 44 points, or 0.54ppg. (44 pts per full season)
In their most recent 41 games (1/2 season):
Reichel has 14 points, or 0.34ppg. (28 pts per full season)
Chinakhov has 26 points, or 0.63ppg. (52 pts per full season)Though by no means comprehensive, it gives solid evidence that
a) Chinakhov is improving as he gains experience
b) Reichel is not improving, and might just be a ~28 point per season player in the NHLMoving beyond point totals:
Chinakhov is over 50% in Corsi-for while Reichel is at 41%
even though:
Chinakhov gets only ~45% O-zone starts while Reichel has had over 57% O-zone starts in his careerBoth players have elite speed, nearly identical rank in top speed bursts.
Chinakhov has a top ranked slapshot for a forward, as high as 98mph.Obviously this can keep going way down into the weeds, but the fact that every single NHL team
could have had Reichel for free and declined, suggests that Reichel has zero trade value on his own. -
AuthorPosts