Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 154 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #5972
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    ^Agreed!

    Don’t you need to help your father replace the urinal cakes in the suite bathrooms?

    in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #5876
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    Athletic Mock Draft had Flyers Picking O’Brien at 6.

    Schaeffer
    Misa
    Frondell
    Desnoyers
    Hagens
    O’Brien
    McQueen
    Martone

    Also of interest. Jack Nesbitt taken at 24. Logan Hensler taken with their 3rd 1st. William Horcoff taken at #36. Ivan Ryabkin taken with their pick at #40. Eddie Genborg taken at #45. Nathan Behm taken at #48.

    Bill, do you see Ryabkin falling that far?

    in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #5865
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    Im in communication with MJL over at Hockeybuzz and FYI the above post is NOT MJL. It is another alt account among many created by the same person.

    in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #5796
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    make a play for Matthews…..could they even put together a good enough package?

    The deal would START with all 3 firsts from this year’s draft. Then start adding until Toronto stops laughing.

    in reply to: Flyers Off Season Discussion: #5793
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    Bill, do you think the Flyers take a home run swing on McQueen to get that size/skill package, or do you think they are still gun shy over the Patrick debacle and McQueens injury history? If they could be sure he was healthy you can’t pass him up. But the back problem is a problem. NHL.com mock has them taking McQueen.

    That being said, out of Hagens, Frondell, Desnoyers, O’Brien, Martin (I see at least 3, possibly 4 of these 5 being available at 6), who do you think they choose?

    If all available my choice is Hagens, he may be smallish but I think his talent level is highest. He is also the one I think will not be there at 6.

    Out of the rest I would probably want Desnoyers.

    How do you feel about taking a swing on Ryabkin with The Edmonton pick if still available?

    in reply to: Therien’s Take: Already One Night and Day Difference #5516
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    The thing about Torts is that he seemed to thrive on conflict for conflict’s sake. Things can get pretty toxic pretty fast in an environment like that. Especially when other players don’t feel like their team mate is being treated fairly. I guess its a way to unite the room in a common fight, in this case, against the coach. But why would you want to hate your coach? Your leader? Why would you as a coach want your team to hate you or fear you? Respect can be earned through mutual respect. And IMO and experience its the better kind of respect.

    in reply to: Emil Andrae? #5319
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    I like him, but he is two small and gets crushed in the corners causing him to lose focus. I think they have a couple of young D men in Leigh Valley that can fill the roster for the Flyers. They will also have the 2025 draft and perhaps a trade or two, so I could see him being moved/traded.

    And to think, we didnt draft Buium in part because we already have Andrae.

    in reply to: Snow the Goalie with Briere and Hilferty re: Tocchet #5290
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    LOL, yeah, he never did.

    in reply to: Snow the Goalie with Briere and Hilferty re: Tocchet #5285
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    BUndy letting Torts have it over the San Filippo incident(s)

    they eat their own once they are fired….

    whats he saying? trying to recall that incident and drawing a blank.

    The whole Kevin Hayes/Cutter Gauthier incident where SanFilippo said it was a Flyers source saying Hayes was influential in Gauthier’s decision. After that Torts refused to answer questions from San Filippo and that “Silly Podcast”.

    in reply to: Snow the Goalie with Briere and Hilferty re: Tocchet #5278
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    BUndy letting Torts have it over the San Filippo incident(s)

    in reply to: Your Realistic Free Agent Goalie Signing #5269
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    I would think the ducks would accommodate and not send him to a team he didnt want to go to.

    I just posted that to say that I guess the Flyers could be one of those teams. BUt if he is guaranteed a starting role etc maybe he wouldn’t put Philly on the list. That being said, I wouldn’t want to trade for him.

    in reply to: Your Realistic Free Agent Goalie Signing #5266
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    He has a NTC I think. Why would he want to go to the flyers?

    10 team no trade list. So take from that what you will.

    in reply to: Shaw Turns Down Assistant Coach Offer #5194
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    I guess I’m not surprised. Do you think Shaw had hopes of being the head coach? Or maybe he didn’t want to be seen as the guy who was foisted on the new staff?

    It is interesting the narrative around Torts and Tocchet. Many descriptions have been used to describe the difference between Torts and Tocchet, “bully”, “abusive”, “embarrassing players”, “poor communication”, “constant negativity” etc. Whereas Tocchet is more private with players, clear communication, good relationships with everybody, positive.

    I would imagine that kind of environment would also have an effect on the coaches and other staff either directly or indirectly. Tocc and Torts are both tough coaches, it seems like Torts thrived on conflict for conflicts sake. Sometimes it can be good, but I think with today’s athletes it just comes off as superfluous. These guys make millions of dollars, it’s not like the old days when they had to work summer jobs to make ends meet, and a coach could threaten his livelihood in a real way.

    in reply to: Next coach? #5094
    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    ^ Agreed!

    Uh oh, son of Hot Dog vendor is back again.

    MBFlyerfan1
    Participant

    Well, it was the worst kept secret in hockey. He’s here. We deal with it. I remember a joke that went something like this.
    Who was the only coach who could keep Steven Stamkos under 25 goals? Rick Tocchet.

    So I went back and did some reading, it looks like Stamkos had very positive things to say about Tocchet in terms of how he developed him as a player and especially rebuilt his confidence after Barry Melrose practically destroyed it.

    It will be pretty hilarious if his staff ends up being Recchi and Richardson, just from the standpoint of watching the fan base lose their minds both positively and negatively depending on the “side” you come down on.

    One thing for sure is that it seems Tocchet may be old school like Torts, but by all accounts he is the opposite it terms of mentality. Whereas Torts was a negative force, it seems Tocchet is more of a positive force.

    So, each old school, but from opposite ends of the spectrum.

    He is here for at least 3 seasons so we should just get used to it lol.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 154 total)
Scroll to Top