Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
senstrolltwo
Participantlumping Marner with JT contract to make it look better is amazing. The entire discount is from JT, so that makes marner look better. thats so on brand fur dummies
senstrolltwo
ParticipantHauge sucks and that deal he signed is shyte. 3rd pair. Benoit is similar but better
Roy would be a decent add. Hope that plays out
senstrolltwo
Participantwhere are people seeing anything about Marchand and the leafs?
I got texted by a Boston fan, and there were multiple obscure websites reporting it. I’m not really sure how it’s possible, would this not be textbook tampering?!?
I just assume tampering isnt really a thing, or nobody really cares. everyone does it and its fine
senstrolltwo
Participantcough**the Kessel trade**cough….
that what that trade makes me think of somewhat.
the leafs trade 2 unknown unprotected 1sts, which is a lot worse.
the habs 2 picks are known. also as per puckpedia those 2 picks are worth #6 overall. if you do the pick math thing.senstrolltwo
Participantwhere are people seeing anything about Marchand and the leafs?
senstrolltwo
ParticipantI know you want to view this trade as a W for the Habs but let’s not forget Dobson was a -16 last year and before you say “he was on a terrible Islanders team” he was +12 the year before on that same terrible team. I have no idea why as I don’t watch the Islanders but you have to wonder why to some degree. Maybe last year was a blip, Habs fans will be hoping so but the pressure will ramp up for this kid now coming to Montreal riding a newly signed 9.5M contract per year.
As a neutral observer IMO neither team is a winner (or loser) in this yet. That won’t be clear until Dobson starts to play with the Habs and the Islanders get their new winger onboard and playing and make their draft picks (and to your point they pan out or don’t) we just really don’t know yet.
I don’t disagree from a strategy perspective this is a deal that makes sense for Montreal but it’s a risk (as is any trade).
i wouldn’t put much into Dobson plus minus.
at 5v5 he was +3 , hes out with empty net so get a lot of minuses. dumb stathis stats slipped last season, but the team as a whole did
I hate liking this move for the scabs
senstrolltwo
Participantquote test
test test
senstrolltwo
Participantquote test
senstrolltwo
ParticipantWOW. UG going to blow his mind with this deal.
I thought his AAV would be higher by 1~2 M.
Now find a 2LW to play with him. ????????oh yeah that donkey will hate it, so thats how you know its a solid signing
I thought it would have to be 5 or 6 years to get it close to 5.Mitch will want 15 or 16 now from the leafs since JT left 2 mil on the table, Mitch is running fast to scoop it up
senstrolltwo
ParticipantGood deal. $4.38m per? That’s great.
4.38 per
also, so pretty much best case scenario here.
John Tavares’ four-year extension includes a NMC for two seasons, before converting to a 5-team trade listsenstrolltwo
Participantyes, johnny hometown discount!!
8.3 aav market Value, thats my boy JT
senstrolltwo
Participantoh I know that, but another reason for me to question Tre moves.
Would be nice if they could move Rielly and get some assets. but thats a dream world
senstrolltwo
ParticipantDobson on the move to Montreal or Columbus?
Please gawd, not Montreal.
yeah..ugh
Tre gets Carlo and Laughton …but should be targeting players like Dobson
senstrolltwo
Participantreally wish the Leafs were able to get Dobson
25yo top pair rhd ..good defense.senstrolltwo
ParticipantThere is no world where knies should get more than Peterka on a 5 year deal, if so than Tre needs to be removed.
Knies had one 50+ pt season with 29 goals
Peterka has had two, along with two seasons of 27 and 28 goals WITHOUT playing with Matthews.
Knies should get 5 x 7m max.oh I agree
But also, at the time Marner shouldnt have gotten 10.9 when all the comps were under 10
-
AuthorPosts