Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 478 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Jays talk #71235
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Jays showing sign of Life, good to see.
    Varland trade looking quite good, gave up 2 players who are in the minors doing not much. Jays have 2 more years after this one of Arb.

    in reply to: Jays talk #71194
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Varland is awesome. Great trade.
    Ya the bullpen looks really good, the hoff is unreliable at times.

    Only April, still early.
    The hitting really has to improve though.

    the Jays Bullpen stats are being dragged down by Little who is gone now. and to a lesser extent Hoffman.

    Biggest issue so far is Bats. Team ops+ of 95, last season was 108
    LAD are currently 148 lol..insane. 115 is generally top of the league

    in reply to: Jays talk #71193
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    And with all that fancy stats, still lost 7 of 13 losses.

    Hoffman absolutely sucks balls as a closer when it matters. Cost them a World Series and needs to be replaced ASAP.

    those are pretty basic stats for 2026. I guess maybe not for everyone

    in reply to: Jays talk #71178
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    the jays are 22 games into the Season, thats the equivalent of 11 games for the Leafs season, so if it were the leafs I would think its also pretty early in the season.

    The bullpen isnt shit…if you pay attention to more than the jays

    Some Bullpen stats

    K/9 Jays are 4th 10.20
    ERA 22nd
    xERA 11th
    FIP 12th
    xFIP #1 3.14 (very good)
    WAR 12th

    when the FIP is much lower than ERA thats a good sign things are going to get better and even out.
    I hadnt look at the stats yet and thats encouraging.

    Varland has been wicked
    Varland, Fisher and Rogers have a combined era of like .50 in 34 innings

    in reply to: Jays talk #71110
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    And none of that will matter when the bullpen and the closer blow every tight game or great start.

    Jays are worse now than they were last year at this point. But sure, they’ll win 65% of the rest of their games and their bullpen will blow game 7 again in the 9th inning to the Dodgers again.

    lol you are the most miserable human. like just insufferable.
    no wonder you fall for every rage algorithm. just loves the misery. cant function without it

    in reply to: Jays talk #71109
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    the Jays were 2 games under .500 on May 27, 2025
    over a month from now. 54 games into the season.
    thats 33 games from now.

    ill wait a little longer

    in reply to: Jays talk #71108
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    the AL east projected wins for 4 of the 5 team 82, 82, 82 and 81

    lots of season left.

    in reply to: Jays talk #71105
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    good sign, stuff will even out of over 160 games.

    Kazuma Okamoto has been devastated by breaking balls so far. He’s got a .186 xBA against them and is whiffing at them more than 41% of the time… But he hit one for a home run yesterday.

    dont let doomer boomers rage and shit their pants over over tiny thing

    in reply to: Jays talk #71104
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    The mets suck, but are spending 80 million more than the Jays on thier roster this season. Spending doesnt mean you win

    also what the fuck are you talking about, the Jays are in the top 5 of money spent. 3 of the top 5 spending teams are 7-15, 8-13 and 8-13
    the records dont mean much at this point.

    and yes I refuse to address all your dumb comments. way too dumb

    in reply to: Jays talk #71082
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    also because small samples are terrible to draw conclusions from
    one of these players cost 60 mil a season and one was 6.8

    95 ab
    3hr
    256/347/390/738
    110 ops+

    73 ab
    2 hr
    262/314/400/715
    100 ops+

    in reply to: Jays talk #71081
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Bo Bichette so far, worse than any Jays hitter this season.
    -.4 WAR
    1 HR
    .54 OPS+
    217/255/283/538

    its a choice to complain about missing Bo.
    replacement Bats Okamoto or Sanchez, doing better than that.

    its a long season. can we not fill this thread with the worst posts possible. like its hard to imagine reading dumber shit than I just read

    in reply to: Leafs Talk 2026 #70777
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    The cap going flat is a horseshit excuse. It was the same for everybody and plenty of other teams that were maxed out on cap space still found ways to make deals happen. The Leafs didn’t. They just kept throwing futures away for old, broken players and wondering why it never worked. The Leafs drafting gave them dogshit for depth up the pipeline. Even if the cap went up, Tavares still would have been an overpayment and total ass in the playoffs.

    The Leafs had too many of the same type of players and too much money invested in them. The cap going up wouldn’t have changed that.

    the timing of it all was just a disaster for the Leafs, just as they had to pay Mitch, Willie and AM the cap died. Yes other teams function in the same cap, but they didnt have 3 young stars all getting big raises at the same time.
    extra cap space would allow them to keep Hyman. the 2021-2023 teams were good, having Hyman would help and whoever else they could add.

    it would compound because they had to spend draft capital to try and fill in the need for those players instead.

    its amazing how Fast Tre tanked the team. he sucks

    in reply to: Leafs Talk 2026 #70774
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    imo the biggest factor to the Leafs not being able to get shit over the finish line is the cap only going up 3 million from 2019-2023
    They loaded up on 4 players and the cap went stagnant and they couldnt fill in the gaps enough with cheaper players.

    Also never moving away from Rielly as the #1 or finding a true #1
    fine player but never a true #1

    in reply to: Leafs Talk 2026 #70765
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    If a team wants McKenna, they will need to ponie up in a trade for the pick
    say to the Rangers has pick #5 as an example for 2 x first (2026 & 2027 top 10 protected) + a 2026 2nd rnd pick (Canes pick) + maybe unsigned prospect

    That’s what I would be looking at. You’s still be able to draft a top RD

    nobody trades a top 5 pick anymore, when was the last time that happened?

    in reply to: Leafs Talk 2026 #70758
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    who the Leafs going to take with the #1 pick?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 478 total)
Scroll to Top