Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 21 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66558
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Regarding Panarin.. we all know he totally misread the room which Drury is apt to do. Like I mentioned prior yeah Panarin had the Rangers over a barrel with the NMC.. only wanting to go to LA etc. Didn’t stop the Flyers from receiving a first and 3rd and Owen Tippet for Giroux. He had the sane parameter in the deal only wanting to go Florida and was a UFA. That is what the return should have been. But then announcing to the league that Panarin is available and we are not resigning him took all the leverage away.
    Drury sat Panarin which made the situation untenable. Having to get rid him for 10 cents on the dollar. Not having a second round pick and not demanding a second rounder in return from LA just shows how clueless this guy is with asset management.
    As for The K’Andre deal..You’re getting a pick at the end of the first rd and Morrow really struggles in his own end as you mentioned ( He’s young so hopefully he will improve, time will tell)
    Waiting for Rangers trades with this guy at the helm is torture.
    Trocheck, Schneider , Carrick maybe JBrodz should definitely be dealt ..but it’s scary thinking of the return?
    Btw non Ranger related ..How did the Pens get Girard and 2nd rounder for Brett Kulak? Seemed like that should have been an even up deal.
    See how it easy it is to get second rd picks? But Panarin couldn’t fetch one..lol

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66397
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    And there ya go! McCarron to Wild takes Trocheck out of the equation.
    Drury overplayed his hand. Now it’s basically Carolina or Detroit..possibly Pittsburgh.
    Was hoping for Yurov and a 1st but that’s over now.
    Also JT Miller on IR.
    Brisson and Morrow sent down
    Up is Chmelar and old friend just mentioned him in my last post.. Parssinen.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66372
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Don’t forget Vakainenen and Parsinnen! ( Who Drury had to have) reports were Drury had been trying to get both of these guys for a while now!
    Again Drury thinking he’s the smartest guy in the room.
    Now it appears he’s overplayed his hand for Trocheck. ( we will see)
    Anyone with his track record under any other owner would have been shown the door..But not us!
    I have never seen a GM who has NEVER made a trade where we could actually say the Rangers did a great job there!
    It’s criminal that he’s in charge of this ( re tool) it’s a rebuild ..but whatever. Dark days ahead.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66319
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Epic performance tonight.. Was I the only one watching that saw Lafreniere hit Merzlikins in the head on the disallowed goal?
    Dave Maloney still is talking about the skate interfering. The fact that Albert and Dave went on for about 15 minutes about it not being goalie interference lol.
    Drury should never be allowed to step foot in the Garden again. ( Taking a team that was a few bounces away from the SCF just 2 years ago and turning it into this mess..) I will say it again they won’t make playoffs for 5-8 years on the conservative side.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64696
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    It’s even more frustrating that the Clown GM didn’t get a first rdr. Kings arent exactly a lock to make the playoffs. ( 3 pts out of Wildcard) Fiala is a huge loss. He drives to the net which Kempe and Panarin are more perimeter although Kempe is really solid everywhere. So yeah we had an opportunity but our General Mismanager frittered it away. I’m so sick of the way this organization does things. Haven’t seen an article yet saying the Panarin deal was good for the Rangers. But hey Panarin had him over a barrel. That Drury gave him access to.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64430
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Not sure..but the tone of the article seems like it’s been this way for many years.
    Just another example where we think we are the smartest team in the room. But I see where Panarin incident certainly didn’t help matters.

    On a side note.. It’s nice watching some fun competitive hockey. So far Slovakia is going toe to toe with Finland. 1-1 heading to 3rd.
    Slovakia only with 5 NHL players.. Finland has 24.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64398
    tbnyr94
    Participant
    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64397
    tbnyr94
    Participant
    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64377
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Did anyone read the Hockey News article about how the Rangers mistreat their prospects? The organization basically puts a muzzle on prospects and is controlling of their players. In fact, Ken Campbell lead writer for THN had contacted OHL’s Windsor Spit Fires about the deal for Liam Greentree after the trade and appparently the Rangers have a gag order and forbid them from talking to the kid about the Panarin trade? Campbell said they are the only organization in the NHL that does this and control their prospects to a detriment.
    Campbell said “ No wonder they are 3rd to last place in the league”.

    The fact that Robertson and Caulfield are not on the team for the sullen JT Miller is a testament how the US mismanagement of their roster continues.
    Olympic Roster fodder:

    Jason Robertson 32g 66 points plus/minus 20

    Cole Caulfield 32g 57 points plus minus 19

    JT Miller 14g 37 points plus minus -22

    Which one would u have selected? LOL

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #64080
    tbnyr94
    Participant

    Yeah good point about JRob..although I believe Guerin has final say. Usually lots of cash tends to sway players. But I think there is too much stain on the last 2 years here. Players talk about that stuff all the time. Panarin chose LA because of what Gavrikov told him. Could you imagine what players are thinking when they see Drury on Team USA? Oh isn’t he the GM of the one of the most disappointing teams in the league and your team no longer competes especially at home? Having Sully there isn’t a good look either and forget Quinn 🙂 Just remember Drury drove the Hartford Wolf Pack into the abyss for 4 years before coming here.
    I still can’t fathom Drury not asking for at least a second rd pick since we don’t have one for 2 years! You think Kings would have hung up the phone being on the cusp of acquiring the Rangers leading scorer last 7 seasons! Just seems like that’s something he should have inquired about. ( spoiler alert Kings are average even with Bread and don’t see them winning a round so forget about better compensation from that deal)

Viewing 10 posts - 21 through 30 (of 40 total)
Scroll to Top