- This topic has 228 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 3 hours, 23 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Pass on tucker if he wants $418 over 11.
Sign Bo 5years – $150m
Sign Bellinger 5 years – $150m
Grab another relievergive me tucker, I dont care about the number
give me tucker, I dont care about the number[/quote]
Not if it means losing Bo and not signing another bat/reliever.
Apparently the Jays have just over $600m to spend, half has already been spent.
Bo, Bellinger, reliever better than tucker imo.Unless its Tucker and Bo….well then go with that.
Not if it means losing Bo and not signing another bat/reliever.
Apparently the Jays have just over $600m to spend, half has already been spent.
Bo, Bellinger, reliever better than tucker imo.Unless its Tucker and Bo….well then go with that.
Tucker is the best player available, if you can get him..do it.
the reliever can be figured out after, make a trade (Miller!), but also a lot can happen with relievers over 162 games, its easier to trade for them. there are always elite closers available at the deadline.
C’mon, Jays, do something. We need something positive to distract us from the train wreck that is the Fancy Pants Leafs.
Pass on tucker if he wants $418 over 11.
Sign Bo 5years – $150m
Sign Bellinger 5 years – $150m
Grab another relieverHe may want that kind of $ but there’s a lot of talk that his market isn’t as strong as was assumed. My guess is that both Tucker and Bo have indicated that they’ll check back in with the Jays before signing anything. I’m not sure that the team has a specific budget right now but will have to go to Rogers if they get something with one or both lined up. I’m sure the bean counters have a pretty good idea of what having a contending means both for team and media revenues. Also, a lot of $ (and talent come off the books next year. Not a bad idea to collect new talent when the team is attractive to FAs.
Kyle Sucker
Cody SmellingerHard pass
Run it back baby!
Would rather see them win
Jays do another thing! Okamoto
Probably takes them out of resigning Bo and maybe signing tucker.
Probably takes them out of resigning Bo and maybe signing tucker.
I think it reduces the chances a little on Bo, but I guess have to make the moves when they present themselves.
projects around 2.5 war, 22-27 hr. .800 ops. solid bat additionDo the Jays have an elite closer that they can rely on to win Game 7 of the World Series with a 1 run lead in the 9th inning vs the 9th batter yet?
No?
Fantastic.
I think it reduces the chances a little on Bo, but I guess have to make the moves when they present themselves.
projects around 2.5 war, 22-27 hr. .800 ops. solid bat addition[/quote]Due to this being the 2nd year the Jays have gone over the luxury tax, they will be charged an additional 30% on top of their current $279m payroll.
If they add Bo or tucker, they will be charge another 60% on top of the 30% because they will exceed the threshold by $60m.This years Jays team could cost over $500m.
Something will have to give.
Berrios is out the door?Due to this being the 2nd year the Jays have gone over the luxury tax, they will be charged an additional 30% on top of their current $279m payroll.
If they add Bo or tucker, they will be charge another 60% on top of the 30% because they will exceed the threshold by $60m.This years Jays team could cost over $500m.
Something will have to give.
Berrios is out the door?They have to get rid of Santander and Berrios, that clears a lot of space to sign somebody more useful.
Due to this being the 2nd year the Jays have gone over the luxury tax, they will be charged an additional 30% on top of their current $279m payroll.
If they add Bo or tucker, they will be charge another 60% on top of the 30% because they will exceed the threshold by $60m.This years Jays team could cost over $500m.
Something will have to give.
Berrios is out the door?yeah, right now to sign someone like Bo or Tucker it 90% tax
Tucker is a better positional fit at this point. But they would need some moves
Do the Jays have an elite closer that they can rely on to win Game 7 of the World Series with a 1 run lead in the 9th inning vs the 9th batter yet?
No?
Fantastic.
only 7 months to figure it out. panic!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.