Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantIncoming huge mistake for Raddysh…Leafs never learn.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantMaking it “fun to play” means giving them the freedom to do as they wish so long as they play hard under the coach’s system. People who read “irresponsible free-for-all” in “fun to play” are doomsday idiots.
Sure, sure. Good luck with that blue and white pipe dream.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantHiller bringing in Dj and who else?
DJ seems like a good assistant coach, not really effective as a head coach in Ottawa although his teams always played with the grit and determination that the Leafs have lacked for years.
Hiller said he intends on making the Leafs “fun to play” which means the players will do whatever the fuck they want, as usual.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantAnd yet, when the moment got too large he shriveled up like your dick the last time you were around a woman, (probably 30 years ago and likely someone related to you).
Also, dunking on two shit teams the first two rounds is not the flex you think it is.
Swept Colorado, kept MacKinnon to 0 goals. Went to the Cup Final. Led the NHL in playoff scoring. All things the Leafs haven’t done since 1967.
But I guess McDavid must suck too for leading the playoffs in scoring and doing nothing in Game 6 or Game 7 vs Florida. It’s also McDavid and Marner’s fault that their goalies couldn’t make a save in the Final. They should both be elite goalies too.
The Leafs going from 1st to last in the division because they lost Marner isn’t the flex you think it is.
Unholy_Goalie
Participanttalking about a power play, a skilled playmaker can move the needle a lot on a PP. what the F are we even talking about here
Talking about an 18 year old rookie.
The Leafs PP has no point shot and a tendency to always just feed the puck to Matthews, no matter what, no matter how. Will that change? I doubt it. It also depends on how much PP time per game he actually gets. Leafs already give Tavares, Nylander, Matthews and Knies well over 2:40+ min per game. After that, the next highest last year was Maccelli (8 PPP) at 1:44 per game, Cowan (6 PPP) at 1:33 per game and Domi (8 PPP) at 1:22 per game. Maccelli and Domi can be pushed aside but is Cowan going to get benched from the PP? Are they going to run 5 forwards to give whomever they draft maximum PP minutes? I doubt it.
Marner averaged 7+ points per 60 PP minutes at 2:54 PP minutes per game over his entire Toronto career. #1 among all Leafs, higher than Nylander, Matthews and Tavares. Replacing that with an 18 year old rookie is a tall order. Again, non-generational player coming in as an 18 year old rookie. In the last 5 years, only two 18 year old rookie forwards have scored 20+ PP points in a season, Celebrini and Bedard. And both were averaging OVER 3 minutes per game on the PP. Nobody in this draft is likely to be that good or given that much ice time.
Matthews (18) 1st season had 21 PP points and Marner (19) also had 21 PP points. If you’re thinking McKenna walks into the NHL and scores 27-30+ PP points like Marner was scoring at his peak in Toronto, you’re huffing blue and white paint. Odds are much stronger he scores 14-18 PP points and the Leafs still struggle to replace Marner’s offensive production both overall and on the PP which was 24 PP points last year and 33 PP points the year prior with the Leafs.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantLeafs might be able to get a very skilled playmaking winger somewhere. one might drop into their lap even next Friday
Non-generational rookies don’t move the needle that far.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantOh, right, because Vegas’ PP was so fucking hot in the Finals. GTFOH with that bullshit.
Oh, right, because he would have been #1 in PP points on the Leafs and was tied for 2nd in the entire playoffs for PP points.
Your brain and reality don’t mix very well.
Unholy_Goalie
Participantto be clear, the only way I would be interested in any of the Canucks players is if Rielly is going the other way.
but if they are doing scorched earth, they dont want RiellyAnd Rielly doesn’t want them. He’d prefer a playoff team and if he felt like being closer to home, he’d push for Seattle long before going to Vancouver.
I would happily take Vince Dunn or Adam Larsson from Seattle before trying to take Pettersson for Rielly.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantCould be a fun summer, canucks look open for Business
Lebrun on Canucks:
Pettersson, Boeser and DeBrusk are available. They want to tear it all down…On Pettersson…I think Canucks are willing to retain.The last thing the Leafs need is the refuse of the Vanpoover Cancucks.
Those three guys are signed until 2031 and 2032. That’s way too long even for accepting a cap dump for a draft pick unless the Leafs blow up the entire team and do a full rebuild.
All three also have a full NMC which means they could say no to a trade to the Leafs which Boeser and DeBrusk most likely would. Pettersson might be so useless he would go anywhere but if he’s that useless, the Leafs should steer clear of adding another problem player who brings the Leafs more of the same garbage that guarantees they lose in the 1st round.
Pettersson has played 8 seasons in the NHL and 6 of them have been substandard for what he is getting paid for now with the last two being absolute dog shit and a big part of the reason why his team was the worst in the NHL. Even if Pettersson was on a 50% retained contract, he still wouldn’t be worth the cap hit for the 40-50 points and -25 he would bring. He’s also painfully weak, gets hurt a lot because of it and plays a soft game overall. Even if his point scoring is rehabilitated by playing with Nylander, the defects in his game would crumble that combo when it matters most as both players would become a huge defensively liability when games get tight and physical.
Can’t see the value in him whatsoever other than the Swedish triangle between Sundin and Nylander. The allure of his single 100 point season isn’t enough to take that risk. He missed the playoffs that season too by the way. If there was a player to grab from that sad sack franchise, it was Bo Horvat. The Leafs missed the boat on that one badly. He would have been a perfect fit and his cost was a joke compared to what the Leafs have paid for rentals.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantLol.
Toxicity central.
Hiller played a 1-3-1 in LA because he had to. Big analytics guy.
It won’t be the same in Toronto.
It’s a good hire. He overachieved in LA. It was just not a good team.
!@#$ your doom and gloom.
Fail hire.
-
AuthorPosts