Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantThat’s a hard pass for me. Can’t be paying a guy 15% of the cap to disappear when the games mean something*
*Yes, I understand we’re paying 2 other players that kind of money to have the same results, but what’s done is done. -WHIPPER
Really? Because that’s factually inaccurate. Marner helped win 2 out of the 3 games against Florida, one with a GWG and the other with a primary assist in Game 6 for the GWG. Matthews had a GWG in Game 6. Knies had a GWG too. It was actually Tavares and Nylander who did next to nothing when the games mattered. And they were on the ice for A LOT of goals against. More than any other forward. Those are the real guys who disappeared.
So…your argument doesn’t hold water.
You’re also unlikely to find guys who actually want to come to Toronto who will be better than Marner for that 15% cap hit.
At least in the scenario where you sign Marner and trade Nylander, you get something in return for Nylander. It’s basic asset management.
Luckily, if they dump Tavares and Rielly, they can keep both, which would be the best course of action.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantTre has a press conference tomorrow, what could that possibly be for?!?!
Announce Marner’s team-friendly $10Mx8!!!
8 years, 13.16 AAV. Kampf has been traded for future considerations to accommodate the increase.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantThis is what gets me. For me, this is a huge assumption. Just because he’s from that area doesn’t mean he would want to play there. I get it, playing closer to were he grew up.
Marner did decline to waive his nmc. So players don’t always say yes.I don’t think it’s that huge of an assumption. When a player has a career crisis, going back home can help them reset and bring comfort. If he has kids, his family can help raise them. Makes his life easier. Brings familiarity to his life. That’s why I also said Seattle, because if Vancouver doesn’t work, there’s another area that is also close that can bring similar benefits.
For Marner, it was the opposite scenario. He wants to stay close to home, not move far away from it. The Leafs were given an offer, they did their due diligence and asked Marner. They didn’t shop him out of town during the offseason. It’s a different scenario. Marner didn’t want to be a rental, didn’t want to go away from home and didn’t want to leave the team he felt he helped build. Rielly, being asked to waive, is a reset for him, not a last minute decision.
This is a no brainer as there are 21 teams they can trade them to. I’d keep Jarnkrok 2.1M for next year for a 2nd/3rd line guy is ok but if you get something better than he could be included in a bigger deal. Let’s say the Leafs do a sign and trade with Vegas Marner 11.5 x 8 nmc + Jarnkrok for Karlsson + Whitecloud. Not saying this will happen or anything like that
Jarnkrok is garbage in the playoffs. I’m sorry, but he has how many career playoff goals? 5 in 105 games? He is the wrong player for this team. He’s fine in Nashville or Columbus or any other team fighting for 8th place. But he’s not a playoff guy. He needs to go away and be replaced. I’d rather have two guys making 1 million each who throw 200 hits each rather than have Jarnkrok at 2+ AAV. If we have guys who won’t score, at least have monsters who hit.
Marner is not doing any sign and trades. He either re-signs or he leaves with his middle fingers up. Sign and trades happen in the NBA, not in the NHL.
Unholy_Goalie
Participantyou are going to need to get some players to waive their n-mtc or nmc to which I do not see happening.
NTC and NMC are waived every single year. They always have. They always will. Including giant contracts like Karlsson if a 3rd party retains salary, if necessary, which helps some teams reach the new 70 million dollar cap floor without paying real dollars.
When a team decides, this player has to go away, the player is not going to dig their heels in and say “never”. They pick the teams they would accept to.
For example, Rielly. Am I suggesting we trade him to San Jose? No. But Vancouver or Seattle? He would accept. They are capable of making the playoffs and he’s originally from BC. That’s not a scenario where he would say no to.
Same goes for Jarnkrok, Kampf etc. These guys have limited NTC. The list of teams they can be sent to is longer than the ones they can’t.
Players accept trades, it’s just a matter of finding them a place they are okay with going to. It’s a process but not an impossible one.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantConfirmed (if anyone cares) User 23BigQuestions HERE is the actual poster from HB (with the handle there Big23Questions) as he messaged me on HB just now. -Cush29
…Big23Questions is a fake. -23BigQuestions

Unholy_Goalie
Participanttavares will be 3c behind poone jenner????
I wonder after all these years what Columbus would expect for him in return with only 1 year left on his deal. He missed most of the year injured last year but he would fit nicely with the Leafs on the short term. Long term, who knows what he would need to re-sign.
Jarnkrok, Robertson, Kampf, McMann, Rielly…these guys all can be dangled to make changes.
Rielly for Blueger and Myers.
Jarnkrok + draft picks for McBain.
Kampf, McMann and Robertson for Jenner.Jenner would have to play C if they bring back Tavares as a LW. I don’t think Jenner, by himself, would be able to carry the entire defensive load with Tavares on one wing and Nylander on the other but it would definitely be an improvement. However, I’d much prefer Reilly Smith over Tavares at LW. He’d be cheaper, a far better defensive player and has more playoff success. Can also play the PK and is from Mimico so he’s a hometown kid too. Except he’s an actual winner, unlike Tavares.
Knies | Matthews | Marner
Smith | Jenner | Nylander
Domi | McBain | B. Tanev
Laughton | Blueger | Lorentz
ComtoisOEL | Tanev
McCabe | Carlo
Dumoulin | MyersWoll | Stolarz
I see that type of team far more aggressive, bigger, defensively sound and overall an improvement.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantConfirmed (if anyone cares) User 23BigQuestions HERE is the actual poster from HB (with the handle there Big23Questions) as he messaged me on HB just now.
I’m so relieved.
Thank you for your service.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantSo many unknowns, but let’s take certain assumptions as reality:
1. Marner is gone.
2. They resign Tavares for about $5.5m
3. They resign Knies for about $7.5m
4. They resign Lorentz for about $1.35m
5. I think they will trade Robertson
6. Getting into only 1 game in the playoffs, they are going to trade Kampf
7. Reaves remains in the minors and they can resign Holmberg for anything under $1.1m and he becomes a no risk asset. Same with Pacioretty, but I think he could be done.If #1 happens, the Leafs are fucked. You can play “money puck” with depth. You can’t replace Marner. Matthews gets worse, Knies gets worse, the PP gets worse. I’ve been asking this question for weeks, can anybody name the team that lost their #1 point scorer as a UFA and won a Cup after? Has that ever happened? Is that common? I think we just witnessed what happens when you try to win a Cup with a team like Carolina because that’s what happens when you try to replace a star (Rantanen) with spare parts and go up against Florida.
If #2 happens, the Leafs are extra fucked. Tavares is not worth a dime more than 2 million. Why? Because he’s so useless defensively, you’d need to spend another 5+ million to put him with players that compensate for his defensive ineptitude.
#3 is an overpayment. Leafs can’t afford to give him that much, that soon. Give me a 3 year bridge deal. If he proves he’s worth big money, give him Domi’s cap hit when his contract expires.
#4 is also an overpayment. The home town kids have to stay at league minimum. Lorentz was offensively useless in the playoffs. Leafs need to keep these 4th liners under 1 million.
#5 absolutely.
#6 hopefully. Perfect example why you can’t give Lorentz 1+ million.
#7 Reaves and Holmberg both suck, let them both go. Pacioretty can come back for league minimum. If he’s done, that would suck, he was great in the playoffs. Hopefully, the drive to get a Cup is enough to make him try it again.
That puts $16.25m on the table and leaves 9 forwards signed (@ 47.95m), that looks something like this:
Knies – Matthews – 1RW
Tavares – 2C – Nylander
McMann – Domi – 3RW
Lorentz – Laughton – JarnkrokAgain, I’m sorry, but this is a sad sack of shit of a team with most of the same guys who were big contributors to the reasons this team did not succeed.
McMann had 0 playoff goals. Domi had some great moments in the playoffs but absolutely sucks defensively. He can’t play center. Much less, a shutdown center on the 3rd line.
The 4th line is more of the same garbage. I’ll give Lorentz and Laughton another chance (gave up a 1st rounder and a top prospect for him so we’re stuck with him), but Jarnkrok has done nothing but proven he is completely useless in the playoffs. Another guy with 0 goals, no size, not enough hitting, not good enough when the games matter. Absolute zero interest in bringing him back at 2+ AAV to play as a 4th liner. Send him to Columbus or some place where they’ll be happy just to make the playoffs.
And the standard 6 D (24.827m):
McCabe – Tanev
Rielly – Carlo
OEL – BenoitWith Stolarz and Woll (6.167m) and another $300k in dead cap from burying Benning and Reaves.
Leafs can’t afford to bring back Rielly both for the cap and for his poor play. He absolutely sucks defensively and since he can’t be used on the PP effectively anymore, he doesn’t score enough to make up for it. The Leafs blueline badly needs another RHD. You can’t afford to have Benoit playing on his off side again. If OEL can be used in offensive situations, the Leafs could afford to replace Rielly with a depth LHD and sign a RHD to make sure they have 3LHD and 3RHD.
Is Easton Cowan ready ($905k)? Steeves (Group 6, so they could resign him for probably $875k)? Do they go after Bennett as a 2C? Ehlers to compliment Matthews and Knies? Do they promote Domi and bump up Laughton to go for an affordable 4C? What is the 3rd line’s identity? Guys like Marchand, Tanev or Rielly Smith bring levels of compete we haven’t seen consistently.
Personally I’d probably still aim for Bennett as the 2C ($7.5m), Tanev ($2m) and Smith ($2.5m). I’m also a really big fan of Pius Suter, who is what we really wanted David Kampf to be.
Cowan isn’t big enough to be ready that young. I think you get 40 games out of him before he hits a wall. Can’t possibly expect him to play 82 games and be effective in the playoffs at his size and age. Steeves is a career AHLer.
I’d love to sign Bennett and Marchand but what are the actual odds of them leaving better weather, lower taxes, less pressure and a better team to join this shit show that is the Toronto Maple Leafs? I could see some players viewing the Leafs as an upgrade (especially if you overpay them) but Bennett and Marchand would be shooting themselves in the foot to join the Leafs.
Tanev isn’t worth 2 million. He had 22 points. If he wants to play with his brother, he takes a discount. I could see Smith signing 2.5 to play in Vegas, but not for the Leafs. He’d cost at least 3.5-4.5 given his playoff pedigree.
Pius Suter is another Jarnkrok / Kampf. Don’t see the benefit of bringing in another smallish, soft player with no proven playoff resume.
You’re gonna miss Marner, but instead of leaning into trying to rebuild a Marner in the aggregate (to use my fancy Moneyball words), you change the dynamic to make the bottom 6 even tougher and better. Round it out and toughen it up.
I’m sorry, but if that’s the Leafs team next year, they won’t get out of the 1st round. Looking at the UFA list, there is only one player who is capable of filling the offensive role of Marner and he’s way past his prime; Patrick Kane. If the Leafs brought in Kane, I could see him scoring 70-80 points with a lot of PP time. But the defensive part of his game is non-existent at this point of his career. He’s also probably going to be injury prone too. If Marner ends up walking, the Leafs will not get better or succeed in the playoffs with this field of UFAs. Losing Marner for nothing will be a giant step backwards that this team probably won’t recover from fast enough before it’s time for Matthews to also walk as a UFA. Because when Matthews reaches UFA status the next time, why the fuck would he stay?
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantBut yeah, JT wasn’t why the Leafs lost……he’s also part of why they didn’t win, but you can’t hang the loss on him alone.
He wasn’t the only reason they lost to Florida but coupled with Rielly he was the single biggest contributor to suckage.
He was on the ice for the most even strength goals against among Leafs forwards. He did not score a point in 6 out of 7 games.
He did not deliver in his prime. He’s not worth even 5 million on the down side of his career.
If he wants to play in Toronto no matter what, he needs to play for 3 million or less. He’s not worth a penny more.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantPeople afraid or opposed to moderation are the ones who need to be moderated the most.

Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantMore nonsense from the guy who doesnt know what communism is eh. -fakechange
More fake change eh?
For the right price, JT can still be a 50pt 2nd line center or shift over to wing or the 3rd line center role.
Oh, 50 points? Wow. For sure we’ll win the Cup now…
3rd line? Yes, of course, genius plan to make the guy who can’t play defense play a shut down role.
The ol’ Tavares doesnt help this win nonsense……it was his goal that got the leafs to the 2nd for the first time in decades.
But ok.The ol’ Johnny Toronto Pajamas propaganda believers are a lost cause. He scored how many goals and points to win games vs Florida? Oh, right, none. He scored one OT series winner in 7 prime years so therefore sign him again in his wheelchair years. It’s like Shanahan never left.
Fake change.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantToo late.
We’ve already got king garbage over here.
No one missed him in the other site.
Or anyone. This place is already polluted with nonsense at times. Get him out.Awww, cupfake…”ban everybody I don’t like”…how familiar…
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantWe need Cush29 and Aaron to moderate this place like they did in the past.
“Moderators” is why everybody is here right now, so, hard pass on that.
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantTavares will come back to the Leafs and be fine as a 2nd line centre. Especially at a considerably cheaper pricetag.
Tavares absolutely sucks and has flown under the radar for blame because of these persistent roomers he will take a “discount”.
That’s the new level of stupidity the Leafs bloodlust mob has reached. If a bad player who doesn’t help you win convinces you he took a “discount” he becomes a hero. Still a loser, but a hero.
Don’t score in 6 out of 7 games in Round 2? No problem because discount.
On the ice for the most even strength goals against on the team? No problem because discount.
On the wrong side of soon to be 35 and slow? No problem because discount and Leafs pajamas.
Tavares has not and will not be fine as a 2nd line center. At his absolute best, he didn’t help this team win. Now, as he approaches his worst years, he will be totally useless. The money that the Leafs “save” by bringing in Tavares will have to be spent just to counter balance the amount of goals scored against while he’s on the ice. And he doesn’t seem capable of being a positive possession player against a team like Florida in the playoffs anymore either. This means whatever cap space he does take up, as “discounted” as it is, he won’t earn that either.
To actually become a positive on the team, he’d literally have to enter Corey Perry territory of less than 2 million a year and just be off to the side until he’s needed on the PP or select offensive zone situations.
For all the screaming Leafs fans are doing about “change”, they certainly want very little of it to actually happen or be effective. Seems really familiar…
Unholy_Goalie
ParticipantSo you guys keep on posting on the same thread and not whatever new blog is popping?
Nobody has ever cared about the blogs.
-
AuthorPosts