Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 71 through 80 (of 294 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66692
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Maloney, “the contending teams blue lines are on the bigger side rather than the smaller side”

    I’ve been saying this forever!!!!

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66689
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I logged out, logged back in, and the new forum was there. I commented in the forum, left. Came back on the site, and now that forum isn’t there anymore even though I know it is bc I commented in it.

    U guys just want to make a discord or something to talk hockey? This is insanity

    in reply to: Jan Levine — Rangers: OT Loss, Trade Deadline, Miller #66685
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I had to log out, then log back in, and now this forum appears. If I just stay logged in, nothing updates on this site.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66658
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Roy got a 1st. Insane how bad Drury is at trading

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66618
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Is not. This is the only forum for the last month+. I posted in a blog a couple blogs ago and got a response from Bill but he seemed aggravated with what I said. Jan said he’d make sure each blog has a forum, but that has yet to happen. Then someone said they’re having issues with the forums they’re trying to resolve. This site is somehow worse than the buzz. I want it to succeed and have offered multiple suggestions, but not a single thing has changed. Very difficult to have flowing conversation on here.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66445
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Regarding the Trocheck trade, we HAVE to hit a home run. We also don’t have to trade him if the return isn’t there. No need to make a trade just to make a trade. Let’s see what the moron does

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66434
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    The wild have nothing to offer. No 1st this year and no 2nd for the next 3 years. Yurov doesn’t move the needle enough for me. I want a trade with DET TB or BOS.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66396
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I’ve been saying for a while Carrick would get us a 2nd. 1st is a stretch, I’d be happy with a 2nd. He should be the one getting the Steven McDonald award also this year, no one on the team more deserving.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66388
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    I’d say the K Miller trade was good/fair value. Same could be said for the Lindgren trade.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66361
    nyrangers9479
    Participant

    Don’t forget the great Vaakaneien.

Viewing 10 posts - 71 through 80 (of 294 total)
Scroll to Top