Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
RangerDanger
Participantthe Panthers had worse injuries to more important players. The Leafs just sucked. How did Montreal and Tampa Bay make the playoffs with MORE games lost to injuries while the Leafs were a lottery team? Tanev missed 71 games .
Wait so you are correcting my #’s and still clinging to the “but but other teams lost more important players” theory? And now your moving the goalposts (as always) claiming pure games lost vs games lost to key players. Ya you are for sure the unhinged retard, king of the retards all day every day. Face it everyone sees through your bullshit on here every day but here you are still retarding on.
Keep going though at least I am enjoying watching you get triggered, scramble and unravel while moving goal posts and creating strawman arguments you little bitch. LMFAO
RangerDanger
ParticipantAgain, you’re too retarded to know the facts. Florida was #1 in games lost due to injury. Vegas was #2. Montreal was #6. Tampa Bay was #7. Toronto was #9. Buffalo was #11.
Barkov missed 82 games. Tkachuk missed 51. Marchand missed 30. Matthews missed 22 when the Leafs were already fucked. Tanev missed most of the season but if the team’s success hinges on Tanev being healthy, the Leafs are constructed like a skyscraper made of popsicle sticks.
If your going to call people retarded maybe you should try not creating strawman arguments, and telling half the story making yourself look like one?
Matthews missed 22 games, Tanev 48, Stolarz 45, Woll big chunks early and late season, Knies 25 games, Domi over 35 games but you knew this already and just decided it didn’t fit your stupid fucking narrative.
Of course you blasted past the point of the original post because your too stupid to understand it – you are the moron who double talks on here non-stop and provides what can be seen as valid reasons (aka excuses) for a lack of success for any team not named the Toronto Maple Leafs but refuse to apply that same rationale to the Leafs.
Your bias is next level and your willingness to make up shit, omit or distort facts and just be a complete and utter moron is astounding but consistent.
Rage on you waste of skin, rage on.
RangerDanger
ParticipantRaddysh is slow footed and suspect defensively. He’s been a minus player before (-4 and -3) including in the AHL (-10, big surprise)
Keep moving those goalposts and being a fucking moron, to not just admit you make shit up and to go back to his 2018-20-19 season in the AHL when he was a -10 to try and pretend you were not full of shit is classic room temp. IQ, moron you. I guess you missed the fact he was a +19 in the AHL in 2022-2023 eh fuckhead?
What’s next you going to pull up someone’s stats from 1 season in peewee hockey to prove a point you fuckling idiot.
Do we now apply your logic & say Marner is going to go back to being the -1 player he was in 2017-2018 in the NHL as a Leaf over 82 games?
Sit down, and shut the fuck up.
RangerDanger
ParticipantBrandon Carlo went from being a +44 in Boston to only +4 in Toronto so things can go very bad, very fast
Things go from 0 to retarded pretty much every time you post – just like your bullshit made up stat was proven to be just that bullshit and made up when you claimed Raddysh will go “back to being a -10” and yet he’s never been anywhere near a -10.
RangerDanger
ParticipantFlorida and the Leafs had major injuries on their roster last year.
Now now, don’t you know the rules here?
You aren’t allowed to say any of the Leafs lack of success is due to reasons like injuries, that only applies to other teams and Toronto missing the playoffs for the first time in a decade is only because Marner is gone and JT sucks & the other reasons the unhinged moron constantly shits out of his pie hole.
RangerDanger
ParticipantI would look at Sim, on the Marlies. He’s an instigator that has tendencies like the Marchand in Florida
I was at the Marlies game Friday when they won and SIM stood out big time, I would LOVE to see him on the Leafs this year, you have described his game perfectly and he has a real knack for getting under the skin of the opponents and is physical. Marchand-esque without the face licking for sure.
Danford underwhelmed me, he and Cowan were on the ice for 2 of the Chicago goals and he paid the price and rode the pine the bulk of the 3rd period and the back half of the 2nd for the most part. I think Danford needs another full year in the AHL.
Akhtyamov is the real deal and the goaltending depth in Toronto is above average for sure IMO.
RangerDanger
ParticipantAll of this Leafs action going on this week and we still have the #1 pick next friday. what a crazy flurry of Leaf content to consume
For most people but then you have the unhinged moron shitting on any and everything non-stop still trying to cope with Marner filling his diapers in games 4,5 and 6 and losing the cup and Conn Smythe (but then again that makes it all a bit more delicious for most people I suppose).
RangerDanger
ParticipantIt’s the same problem the Leafs will have with Raddysh 3 years from now when he’s back to scoring 30-40 points and -10.
This is exactly the type of retarded made up bullshit you spew non-stop when your not busy with strawman arguements or moving goalposts you fucking moron.
Raddysh has never been a -10 in his entire NHL career, not even close but sure go on and make shit up while screaming at others and claiming they made shit up.
Just shut the fuck up and go cheer for Vegas and do everyone a favour.
RangerDanger
Participantbut he’s not a true top pair guy worth top pair money
8.5M isn’t top pair money or it won’t be this season.
Wait and see what Kucherov gets on his new deal, or Makar after this season, same for Quinn Hughes.
IF (and yes it’s an IF for sure) Raddysh’s play continues the way he played this past year for the first 4 or 5 years of this deal the Leafs made out like bandits are people will say how good the value for money is (much like many do with Makar’s deal now). If Raddysh takes a step back it’s a new whipping boy for the media and fanbase once Reilly is moved.
It could always be worse, look at what Pittsburgh is paying for Karleson or Edmonton is paying Nurse! lol
RangerDanger
ParticipantWrong. CBC was leaning conservative prior to Carney. The CBC isnt controlled by the feds
Most media outlets are owned by conservative or repubes. Alot owned by yanks
Anything postmedia – yanks
National post, Ottawa citizen, the garbage toronto and vancouver suns, the herald and gazette.The fact that you used the term “woke culture” simply proves you really dont know what you are talking about.
You sure about that? – meaning the bolded part.
The CBC has been viewed as being VERY left leaning / supportive before Carney, Rosemary Barton and the others couldn’t stop themselves from lapping up everything Trudeau had to say and rebroadcasting it as if it was the word of god.
Which was CBC was viewed as leaning in the past is irrelevant now for the most part but the liberals have propped it up and given it more money than the Conservatives did – here is some CBC funding info from the last 3 years of Harper to today that you may (or may not) find interesting:
• 2012-13: Reduced by $27.8 million.
• 2013-14: Reduced by $41.8 million.
• 2014-15: Reduced by $45.4 million.
• 2015–2016: Upon taking office, the Liberals reversed prior cuts to CBC, injecting an immediate $75 million into the broadcaster’s budget, followed by $150 million in ongoing annual reinvestments
• 2018–2020: Base parliamentary funding stabilized at roughly $1.2 billion annually.
• 2020–2021: Appropriations temporarily increased to approximately $1.4 billion to cover retroactive salary increases and pandemic-related costs.
• 2024–2025: The federal government included extra top-up funding (e.g., an additional $42 million) in the budget, bringing the estimated total to nearly $1.38 billion.
• 2025–2026: The government added a $150 million funding top-up to help update the broadcaster’s operations.
• 2026–2027: Main estimates for the 2026–27 cycle allotted $1.383 billion. While this reflects a decrease of $192 million compared to the 2025–26 cycle, analysts noted that this is not a reduction to the CBC’s base funding, but rather the expiration of those temporary top-ups from the previous year. -
AuthorPosts