Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
flip side, they Leafs havent had a D as good since….Salming?
i know it doesnt happen without Knies going the other way..but yeah. there is like 3 or 4 D i would trade Knies for and he is one of themPlug one hole to create another. It’s a dumb lateral trade.
Moving Nylander makes more sense because they can replace him with McKenna. There is no internal immediate replacement for Knies.
And Werenski could be a two year rental unless they get a guarantee he signs an extension or he and Matthews could leave together. Not worth it for Knies plus the farm.
Could there be a goalie deal to be had with New Jersey?
They kinda need a goalie and Stolarz could fit there needs.Yeah there’s a couple of unproven goalies there but how else are going to get the experience.
I’m think the Leafs will go after Bob. 4×7.5 ishIf Bob comes to Toronto, Stolarz stays. They’re friends.
Bob wants 6 or 7 years, that’s why Florida said bye.
Philip Tomasino wasn’t qualified. Could be a cheap depth addition, low risk. Only 24 years old, has scored 10+ goals a couple times, local kid, can skate like the wind, high hockey IQ. Worst case, he helps the Marlies.
I hope the Leafs don’t make an offer for Werenski.
The cost would be to great for the Leafs to lose.
Avs 2027 1st, Knies, Danforth or Cowen and a prospect like Quillan.For me, that’s to rich. I’d rather go after Ramus Andersson
I agree, 2 year rental of Werenski and then he can walk with Matthews as a UFA. Not worth Knies.
Andersson is 99% going back to Vegas. 7 years x 8.5 AAV.
Maccelli not qualified.
I didn’t like that trade. I didn’t like Maccelli. But that’s a waste of an asset.
Stecher signed for two years at 1.35 AAV. That’s pretty cheap but he’s pretty small. He’s a good 7th D but the Leafs still have problems on the right side, especially when Tanev gets hurt again.
Gudas is going back to Florida. Traded his rights for the rights to AJ Greer. Was hoping Greer would become a UFA. He’s a solid bottom six addition. Hits everybody.
so Gallagher got traded with half of his current cap hit being retained for future consideration.
I should note there was NO draft pick sent with Gallagher to Vancouver.Because Montreal ate half the cap hit. If Vancouver took the whole contract, Montreal would have to pay for it. We’ve seen the Leafs do it with Marleau and Mrazek. Or maybe only the Leafs are the retarded franchise that pays a 1st (Seth Jarvis + Sam Rinzel) to take a bad contract.
Came to read how unhinged the unhinged hero went due to the draft.
He went next level on every single thing the Leafs did while stroking it to everything the Sharks did. Did anyone tell him Marner isn’t a Shark?
UG you should probably invest in some anger management classes. You need help.
I’ve never once logged in wondering what you’ve written but you seem dangerously obsessed with me though. Living rent free in your head. And it’s spacious.
I “need help” but you need multiple accounts to harass me. Alrighty then Big23IQ Retard Ranger.
will the Leafs send a draft pick to the Florida for Bobrovsky rights????
He wants a six or seven-year contract worth $42 million and he’s 38 years old at the start of the season. It’s retarded. The absolute max you could give to Bob without creating an albatross contract situation is 3 years. I could live with a 3 year, 7 AAV contract. But 42 million over 7 years, no fucking chance.
Other than using the Leafs to increase his money either by getting overpaid or creating the illusion of multiple offers during negotiations, why would he? He could win another Cup in sunny Florida. He could do the same in Carolina, Vegas or Edmonton. Why Toronto? To be buddies with Stolarz? It doesn’t add up. If he asks 7×6 from the Leafs, maybe a contender gives him 5×6 and that’s what he’s really after.
And for the Leafs, do you really want to end up with a 40-45 year old goalie making 7 AAV? The Leafs got some magic out of Belfour at the end of his career back in the day (that’s probably the dumbass fantasy Chayka is trying to recreate) but the reality is, with all the issues the Leafs still have, Bob is unlikely to be good enough to carry the Leafs as he approaches 40 much less beyond 40.
It’s just a bad piece of business for both sides. And this is coming from a guy who was 150% behind signing Bob to his 7 year, 70 million dollar deal (instead of Tavares) when he left Columbus. At that time, Bob was exactly what the Leafs needed. But not now, not at 38-45. I’d literally rather have Skinner or Andersen or any other stop gap veteran for 2 or 3 years until one of the Leafs prospects takes over the net or another, younger, more viable option presents itself.
And this is so strange coming from what is supposed to be an “advanced stats” GM who can’t take a shit without using analytics. Should be really obvious that giving a 38 year old goalie a 7 year contract is absolutely retarded.
Hope it doesn’t happen but with the Leafs, the most retarded outcome is usually what happens because it’s the Leafs and they’re an organization run by retards.
Carolina acquired the rights to John Carlsson. Already loading up for a repeat.
Werenski, Norris Trophy winner, is being shopped. Stars, Sharks, Hurricanes, Lightning and the Leafs are talking to Columbus. Leafs are probably only on that list because of Matthews and to drive up the price. Edmonton isn’t reported to be on his list but Babcock was a huge fan of his and with Edmonton in desperate need of help on D could try to make something happen there if they were aggressive enough.
Leafs would have to give up a boatload to get Werenski but one of the few players where you could justify Knies going the other way. Would rather send Nylander though especially with McKenna being drafted and taking the throne of small, soft, one-way player. Nylander was always expendable but now he’s VERY expendable. Having one type of guy like that is enough. Two is too many. Werenski would also have to agree to a long term extension because it’s only two years until he’s a UFA and the last thing you’d want is him walking with Matthews at the same time. Nightmare scenario.
