[senstrolltwo]

PrinceLH wrote:

If the Leafs took on Petterson’s full cap hit, maybe a straight up trade for Rielly could work. The gamble could work if Petterson regains his scoring prowess and in a year, he could be tradeable or better yet, an asset. It would make it feasible to move Matthews for a boat load of talent and draft capital. With the proper moves and a bit of luck, the retool could restructure the Leafs quicker than we think. Petterson with Nylander and pick your left winger, either Knies or McKenna and you have something.

I was thinking to keep AM, at least for the rest of his contract, a couple play makers like EP and Mckenna would help.
Matthews, Nylander, Tavares, Petterson, Mckenna, Knies decent 6.

Its the D that is the Challenge to fix

[senstrolltwo]

Andersson and Marchment would be fine targets.

I also proposed this yesterday, iv Van wanted to move Elias Petterson, a Rielly (plus whatever) for EP if Van would retain a couple mil. gets his cap to 9.6
would be a good 2/3 Center with JT. and maybe he regains a bit of scoring.

[senstrolltwo]

listening to Chayka in interviews, he sounds better than what you heard from Treliving.
Low bar I know. but Ill take it at this point

[senstrolltwo]

Mckenna Stenberg comps

https://x.com/ByronMBader/status/2052109183970062506?s=20

[senstrolltwo]

Trade Rielly to Van for Petterson if Van Retains 2mil
add remove whatever makes it feel more even

[senstrolltwo]

dmnted wrote:

I think he does want out now as the Over Drive panel were talking about it.
It was someothing like if this team isn’t competitive than trade me.
I think if that happens, Nylander is surely to follow him out the door.

Leafs really dont have a choice now but to try and get back to the playoffs.
I am not convinced Matthews wants out, and I understand if he wants to be on a team that is going for it.

I think you keep him (and Nylander) for this coming season and see how it plays out. And if you cant sign AM, you move him after the season or TDL whatever.

Having #1 pick changes a lot

[senstrolltwo]

Still cant beleive the Leafs got #1 lol

imagine being the Canucks, having a dog shit season, trading the best Dman you will ever have and getting #3 …so good

[senstrolltwo]

Unholy_Goalie wrote:

McKenna is not good enough to fix this team by himself

iv never seen anyone say that. why do you keep saying it. nobody is thinking 1 player fixes a team.
a #1 pick in your hand is better than 2 unknowns. they werent rebuilding yet anyway.

Having #1 gives a lot more options and opens lots of interesting possibilities, if they chose to go that route

[senstrolltwo]

Unholy_Goalie wrote:

Imagine being so blinded by homerism that you can’t see the Leafs are still absolutely fucked and this pick is simply delaying the rebuilding process that is necessary.

Biggest losers since 1967 for a reason anybody in hockey has ever seen.

one day they will tank and rebuild and hopefully get a #1 pick that rebuilding teams need

[senstrolltwo]

imagine being such a loser you are online doom posting about the Leafs having the #1 pick.
biggest loser energy iv ever seen

[senstrolltwo]

Mckenna or Stenberg…no other options
unless trading for Mcdavid

Or trade Matthews to SJ for #2 pick ++

[senstrolltwo]

the #1 pick is on the table for Mcdavid, do your think Chayka

[senstrolltwo]

UG haha right on schedule. so predictable

[senstrolltwo]

lolz

waits for UG to have his negative spin

[senstrolltwo]

not bad, not bad
Jays need a closer

Louis Varland: 16 IP, 26 Ks, 0.56 ERA, 4 saves
Mason Miller: 15.1 IP, 29 Ks, 1.17 ERA, 10 saves

of course he wont end with a sub 1.00 era, and he will blow saves, everyone does.

now the Bats..you are up…do stuff

[Author]

Posts