Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 305 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11855
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    7.7M cap hit over 5 year.

    Knies comp?

    sure, peterka has more games, points, better pts/gm, goals gm, season high points etc etc.
    pretty much every catgory hes got better numbers.

    so far.

    if they Leafs could get knies for similar cap but longer term, its a win I think

    but taxes blah blah

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11841
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    peterka off the board. big Meh
    Buffalo is a mess

    Leafs are apparently in on everyone…which also means noone

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11634
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Ovechkin took 13 years to win the Cup. Yzerman took 14.

    Perfectly Leafy that the Leafs would start the blow up of the team prematurely.

    you are the one saying the leafs are done and he is leaving.. jfc
    If he wants to leave, nothing they can do… and prefect time to rebuild.

    you talk out both sides of your mouth

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11577
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    I dont see Marner as a coaster. Hes just soft and gets jittery when team bang and crash him and his dispy doodling doesnt work anymore.

    Vegas has 18 players and 9.6 cap space. so a lot of room to clear to sign 4 or 5 players, esp if Marner is 13

    Hertl or Karlsson would be good targets, not sure they would move Eichel but with 1 year left..id check

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11568
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Evander Kane is a big Meh for me, only 1 season so its not a huge risk.
    Issue with the Leafs is they dont have a lot of runway left for rolling the dice, they need legit difference makers with the cap space they have. cant take a shot an miss anymore

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11557
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    So like 12 years oh Matthews and then a rebuild. yeah that makes total sense. if they havent won in 12 years, Rebuild is fine

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11486
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    what it take to get lawson crouse?

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11375
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Stamkos 8×4 after a 40 goal season at age 34

    then has 27-26-53
    have to think a similar decline for JT is coming very soon and pay accordingly

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11352
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    My limits for JT would be something like …
    5×4.6 (8,8,4,2,1)
    4×5.5 (8,8,4,2)
    3×6.3 (7.5,7.5,4)

    If he doesn’t like it so be it ….he did nothing significant in the playoffs and is declining. You can rent JT’s at the deadline without destroying your cap for years.

    im the same, those numbers are fine, but wouldnt do something like 7mx3, just move on. stick to your numbers

    also I could see him getting UFA offers like 7 or 8m x 4 or 5 years

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11337
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    if JT was getting money from another contract, the leafs and JT would still be “wide apart”, thats how it works

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11335
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    I believe Duchene is also getting paid by Nashville for the next 4 years…another $2.5m per. So he’s gonna make about $7m per season in total.

    sure, but he certainly could have gotten more regardless

    in reply to: Leaf Talk – 2025-26 Season #11330
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Chris Johnston mentioned that the Leafs may pivot to Mikael Granlund, for example, if Tavares walks.

    CJ added the Leafs and Tavares are still “wide apart” on money. If the Leafs go long-term, that might help bridge the gap, but neither side is there yet. Both sides understand they’ll have to move, and with a week before July 1st, Tavares is still more likely to re-sign than not.

    another problem is, if they dont sign Tavares… they could pivot to a worse player.

    it always seems like other teams get an quick easy deal done… 80 point player Duchene signs for a ham sandwich and bottle of rum, Leafs and JT are far apart .. same ol stuff

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11274
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    players are not totally taxed based on the Team/city that they play for, the 41 home games are and the rest are taxed based on where the game is played and a whole bunch of other stuff.

    Do players on teams in no-state-tax areas gain a massive financial advantage?
    There are six teams in the NHL that play in cities that do not levy a state income tax. These teams are the Florida Panthers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Nashville Predators, Seattle Kraken, Vegas Golden Knights and Dallas Stars. Undoubtedly, this is a financial advantage for these players and is being used as a recruiting tool by these teams. However:

    Players on these teams still owe taxes for games played in other states and provinces.
    For high earners, federal taxes (U.S. or Canadian) typically dwarf state taxes, meaning the state tax benefit is often overstated.

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11130
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    Leafs lost who gives a shit and its not like its 1 year, its 10 years of failure.

    the team hasnt won a fucking thing as is. in 10 fucking years.

    in reply to: Final Destination – Mitch Marner?? #11123
    senstrolltwo
    Participant

    And yet has more career playoff points than everybody on the team so clearly the stupidity is in the complimentary pieces they keep failing to acquire.

    because they have to overpay Mitch to shit his pants when they have to win a game.

    14mil to not help his team win.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 305 total)
Scroll to Top