Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67670
    Brukie
    Participant

    Do you get banned or something?

    And for the record I told my ex wife the same thing. Fkin MAGA cvnt

    Ha, I can see she was the smart one in the ex relationship!!! LOL

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67635
    Brukie
    Participant

    Not sure I 100% agree with the sheath and fox thing but I’ll admit I haven’t watched enough games to truly say anything there.

    The bread thing, to me at least, is up in the air until we see Laf do this for at least a full season. If making him a top line player was what he needed to get off his ass, great. But I’m not convinced just yet.

    Now the JT Miller thing really concerns me as it’s not just an on ice product issue. Maybe him being away from the boys has helped as well. Either way, unfortunately we will continue to not fail hard enough for McKenna

    What happened with Miller?

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67600
    Brukie
    Participant

    Maaaaaybe Drury gets some credit for picking up Kartye. I’ve probably come to the wrong place tho. I do realize he gave up Buch a few years ago 🤣

    Tj, you are boasting about the GM of a team that is sitting in a lottery spot!!! ROTFLMAO!!!

    You cant make this shit up!!!

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67465
    Brukie
    Participant

    So you do support pedophilia got it. Support the murder of innocent Iranian children too? An entire elementary school of em, “because they missed”.

    Terrible tragedy.

    Yeah I cant believe people voted for him. His own daughter in her diary said Joe use to take showers with her.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67426
    Brukie
    Participant

    pedophilia.

    WTF?

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67276
    Brukie
    Participant

    LAF right now has 17 points in his last 20 games, since January. Hes definitely opened his game up a bit. Schneider has also looked better. They are still trade assets. as is Trocheck. Sure we need help in a variety of ways, but we do have tradeable assets as well as a lot of cap space. Thats why I say its not over yet, we will see what he does this off-season. I remain incredibly unhappy with how we got here, but these are the cards we’ve been dealt and we have no choice but to watch it all unfold.

    Kreider was a blunder.
    Trouba, look it was a bad trade, but there were days, weeks where people wanted him off the team, were willing to trade him for a bag of pucks… then he gets traded for a bag of pucks and people arent happy.
    Same with Goodrow, people wanted him off the team. Said his cap hit was too high to justify his place in the lineup. However the way this was handled set of a chain reaction of really horribly managed moves.

    All of Chris “Milbury” Drury trades have been unforced, rush trades for no reason. Goodrow was brought here to be a playoff guy, that was it, Chris “Milbury” Drury gave him the contract. In the playoffs, Goodrow had 6 goals on 4th line minutes, Mika and Panarin combined for 9 with PP time, Goodrow did the job that he was suppose to do.

    Ha Tj popped in on another thread and is off course pulling his chain over this mini win streak.

    Still loves Chris “Milbury” Drury

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67201
    Brukie
    Participant

    Kreider would on pace for 57 pts and 31 goals this season if he played a full 82 games. The fact Drury traded that for a 3rd round pick is absolutely insane. The more I think about the position he’s put this franchise in the more aggravated I get he still has a job. And even firing him, the damage is done. He has destroyed this team for years to come.

    What he does this off-season will determine whether he really has destroyed it. Hes gonna have a very high draft pick and some solid assets to work with.

    As far as Kreider goes, despite the fact that Ive always been a bit of a Kreider hater, the fact that there was no market for Kreider and he settled for what he got was definitely a massive blunder. Again, this stemmed off of him opening his mouth about changes and all.

    There was no rush to trade CK20 or Trouba or Goodrow, he just wanted to trade them and got nothing in return. Thats an idiot. What does Drury have to work with? What assets? An under performing Laffy and Schneider? One player isnt going to fix this team, if that was the case, Panarin would have be able to fix the team himself. Unless Miller, Mika and Fox waive, the Rangers dont have anything of value.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67194
    Brukie
    Participant

    Drury is our Mike Milbury

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #67192
    Brukie
    Participant

    I was thinking about this whole RFA thing, and thought about how the whole Marner thing went down last off-season. Maybe Drury has something up his sleeve.

    First move. What if we trade a cost controlled, low AAV 2C to Vegas, who needs all the help they can get to stay under the cap for Dorofeyev? Straight up. Hes due a massive raise, one that the Knights cant afford. Trocheck <> Dorofeyev

    Second move. Trading Panarin to the Stars for Robo made no sense for Dallas. However, what if we trade Greentree to Dallas for Robo? Dallas has some cap space, but can they afford to pay another guy 14 million? Thats pretty much all the cap space they have for next year.

    So now, when you look at the overall situation. Rather than trading Trocheck for a 1st, 3rd and a prospect, we get Dorofeyev, a 30+ goal scorer. Despite the controversy surrounding the initial return, the end game turns Panarin > Greentree > Robo. Another 30+ goal scorer.

    Just messing with an idea.

    This is inline with a TJ trade idea. Would you do those trade if it was reversed? Nobody in the world would trade a bonafide star for a prospect. There will be so much more needed there. Why would Vegas trade a 25yo 30+ goal scorer for a 33yo 50 point player? Trocheck was never a second line center, he is a 3rd line center. Vegas always finds a way. to make it work.

    Drury has nothing up his sleeve nor in his head.

    in reply to: Rangers: Panarin Trade Analysis #66987
    Brukie
    Participant

    This is where I disagree with you. You cant go out an announce you are trading a player, hold him out of the line up and not trade him. Drury did this before and it back fired. It affects the player and it could possibly affect the room, the room is still probably toxic and he is just encourages more toxicity.

    Second off, either Drury is over valuing Trocheck or other GMs think they can fleece him, which is bad on both fronts. If other teams think Drury is an idiot, which Im sure most do, then there are other player and options out there, Trocheck isnt the only player that has to be traded. If Drury thinks Trocheck is worth more then thats a bigger problem because he will never get traded.

    As for stock piling picks, who cares about 3rd to 7th rounders. The chances of them making an impact are less that 20 or so percent. You need 1st and second rounders and you need to develop them, which the Rangers cant.

    I found this draft player playing percentage stats which is what Im talking about.

    1st ROUND PICKS [1267 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 1131 (89.30%) 0 GAME : 136 (10.70%)
    100+ GAMES : 872 (68.80%) < 100 : 395 (31.20%)
    500+ GAMES : 524 (41.40%) < 500 : 743 (58.60%)

    2nd ROUND PICKS [1317 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 887 (67.40%) 0 GAME : 430 (32.60%)
    100+ GAMES : 503 (38.20%) < 100 : 814 (61.80%)
    500+ GAMES : 219 (16.60%) < 500 : 1098 (83.40%)

    3rd ROUND PICKS [1286 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 662 (51.50%) 0 GAME : 624 (48.50%)
    100+ GAMES : 362 (28.10%) < 100 : 924 (71.90%)
    500+ GAMES : 129 (10.00%) < 500 : 1098 (90.00%)

    4th ROUND PICKS [1291 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 528 (40.90%) 0 GAME : 763 (59.10%)
    100+ GAMES : 274 (21.20%) < 100 : 1017 (78.80%)
    500+ GAMES : 105 (8.10%) < 500 : 1186 (91.90%)

    5th ROUND PICKS [1305 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 431 (33.00%) 0 GAME : 874 (67.00%)
    100+ GAMES : 194 (14.90%) < 100 : 1111 (85.10%)
    500+ GAMES : 63 (4.80%) < 500 : 1242 (95.20%)

    6th-7th ROUND PICKS [2528 players]

    MIN. 1 GAME : 697 (27.60%) 0 GAME : 1832 (72.40%)
    100+ GAMES : 330 (13.00%) < 100 : 2199 (87.00%)
    500+ GAMES : 128 (5.10%) < 500 : 2401 (94.90%)

Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 242 total)
Scroll to Top